DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 248 So. 2d 295.

30 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Louis Joseph George La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. KHALFANI 998 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Collins 998 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. James R. Skipper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Skipper 861 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Duhe 733 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Guin 444 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Lowdins 412 So. 2d 1349 La. 1982
    Art. 831 which states in pertinent part: *1351 A defendant charged with a felony shall be present: (3) at the calling, examination, challenging, impanelling, and swearing of the jury, and at any subsequent proceedings for the discharge of the jury or of a juror; However, , (1971): (1) A trial court may excuse a member of the petit jury venire at any time prior to the time he is sworn as a juror to try a particular case.
  • State v. Meriwether 412 So. 2d 558 La. 1982
  • State v. Edwards 406 So. 2d 1331 La. 1981
  • State v. Cass 356 So. 2d 936 La. 1977
  • State v. Sheppard 350 So. 2d 615 La. 1977
  • State v. Gomez 319 So. 2d 424 La. 1975
  • State v. Witherspoon 292 So. 2d 499 La. 1974
    art. 783, see Official Revision Comment (b); , (1971); State v. Jugger, 217 La.
  • State v. Jack 285 So. 2d 204 La. 1973
  • State v. Tharp 284 So. 2d 536 La. 1973
    (1971); State v. Hudson, 253 La.
  • State v. Douglas 278 So. 2d 485 La. 1973
    (1971), in which Justices Barham and Dixon concurred, Justice Tate agreed that the issue had not been properly before the court in Hudson.
  • State v. Soukup 275 So. 2d 179 La. 1973
  • State v. Pope 273 So. 2d 272 La. 1973
    221 , (1971) (murder); , (1971) (manslaughter); State v. Arnold, 259 La.
  • State v. Rose 271 So. 2d 863 La. 1973
  • State v. Hayes 269 So. 2d 814 La. 1972
  • State v. Franklin 268 So. 2d 249 La. 1972
    (1971); State v. Hudson, 253 La.
  • State v. Riley 260 So. 2d 914 La. 1972
  • State v. Colomb 260 So. 2d 619 La. 1972
    Aside from procedural reasons why this court could not allow the relief as to a directed verdict ( , (1971)), the sole basis for the defendant’s argument disappears upon the trial judge’s factual determination, which is given great weight and will not be disturbed upon appeal unless clearly erroneous.
  • State v. Roque 256 So. 2d 432 La. 1972
    Aside from procedural reasons why this court could not allow the relief as to a directed verdict ( , (1971)) and a new trial, the sole basis for the defendant’s argument disappears upon our finding that the inculpatory statements *433 were properly admitted and constituted evidence relating to the defendant Roque’s guilt upon which a jury verdict could properly be based.
  • State v. Wallace 256 So. 2d 428 La. 1972
  • State v. Dillon 255 So. 2d 745 La. 1971
  • State v. Vessel 256 So. 2d 96 La. 1971
    Aside from procedural reasons why this court could not allow the relief as to a directed verdict ( , (1971)) and a new trial as prayed for, the sole basis for the defendant’s argument disappears upon our finding that the confession and murder weapon were properly admitted and constituted evidence relating to the defendant Vessel’s guilt.
  • State v. Graves 250 So. 2d 727 La. 1971
    (1971); State v. Holmes, 258 La.
  • State v. Arnold 249 So. 2d 552 La. 1971
    See, State of Louisiana v. Williams, La., , decision handed down May 4, 1971.