Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Harris, 247 So. 2d 847.

47 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Marvin K Chest La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
So.2d 847 (1971), the Court held that the determination of the appropriate penalty and the imposition of sentence in non-capital cases are functions of the judge and that the jury is concerned only with guilt.
State of Louisiana v. Sharrieff M. Kent La. 2024
(where reference to a “mug shot” was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by defendant); So.2d 847 (1971) (where no crime was evidenced by a police officer’s reference to obtaining defendant’s photograph from the Bureau of Investigation).
State v. Smith 275 So. 3d 266 La. 2019
See , e.g. , State v. Harris , , 247 So.
State v. English 243 So. 3d 1145 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
1976) ; State v. Harris , , (La.
State v. Lee 217 So. 3d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
(where reference to a “mug shot” was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by defendant); , (1971) (where no crime was evidenced by a police officer’s reference to obtaining defendant’s photograph from the Bureau of Investigation).
State v. Lilly 111 So. 3d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In other than capital cases and cases carrying mandatory penalties, sentencing regulations form no part of the “law applicable to the case.” See White, 399 So.2d at 177 ( , (1971) (case concerned crime of armed robbery, which carried a sentencing range of imprisonment at hard labor for a minimum of five years and a maximum of ninety-nine years)).
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Gene Hollier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
(where reference to a “mug shot” was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by Defendant); So.2d 847 (1971) (where no crime was evidenced by a police officer’s reference to obtaining Defendant’s photograph from the Bureau of Investigation).
State v. Hollier 37 So. 3d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
(where reference to a “mug shot” was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by Defendant); , (1971) (where no crime was evidenced by a police officer’s reference to obtaining Defendant’s photograph from the Bureau of Investigation).
State v. Young 938 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
(where reference to a "mug shot" was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by defendant); , (1971) (where no crime was evidenced by a police officer's reference to obtaining defendant's photograph from the Bureau of Investigation).
State v. Clark 924 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
(where reference to a "mug shot" was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by Defendant); , (1971) (where no crime was evidenced by a police officer's reference to obtaining Defendant's photograph from the Bureau of Investigation).
State of Louisiana v. William L. Giles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
(where reference to a “mug shot” was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by defendant); So.2d 847 (1971)(where no crime was evidenced by a police officer’s reference to obtaining defendant’s photograph from the Bureau of Investigation).
State v. Giles 884 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
(where reference to a "mug shot" was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by defendant); , (1971)(where no crime was evidenced by a police officer's reference to obtaining defendant's photograph from the Bureau of Investigation).
State v. Brown 871 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
(where reference to a "mug shot" was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by defendant); , (1971) (where no crime was evidenced by a police officer's reference to obtaining defendant's photograph from the Bureau of Investigation).
State v. Bradford 846 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
(where reference to a "mug shot" was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by defendant); , (1971) (where no crime was evidenced by a police officer's reference to obtaining defendant's photograph from the Bureau of Investigation).
State v. Prudhomme 829 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
(where reference to a "mug shot" was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by defendant); , (1971)(where no crime was evidenced by a police officer's reference to obtaining defendant's photograph from the Bureau of Investigation).
State v. Williams 811 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
(where reference to a "mug shot" was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by Defendant); , (1971) (where no crime was evidenced by a police officer's reference to obtaining Defendant's photograph from the Bureau of Investigation).
State v. Offray 797 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Dillion 770 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
(where reference to a "mug shot" was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by defendant); , (1971) (where no crime was evidenced by a police officer's reference to obtaining defendant's photograph from the Bureau of Investigation).
State v. Harris 742 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Edwards 750 So. 2d 893 La. 1999
(where reference to a "mug shot" was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by defendant); , (1971) (where no crime was evidenced by a police officer's reference to obtaining defendant's photograph from the Bureau of Investigation).
State v. Humphrey 694 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Likewise, , the Supreme Court found that, where the officer testified that he went to the "B of I at police headquarters" to obtain defendant's picture, no reversible error was presented.
State v. Morgan 671 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Merrick 598 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Thus, , (1971) the court remarked, "We doubt that the policeman's reference to obtaining the photographs [including defendant's] at the Bureau of Identification amounts to the assertion of a criminal record.
State v. Shannon 531 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Livas 527 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
(1971) a policeman testified that he went to the B of I at Police Headquarters and obtained photographs.
State v. Calzadilla 455 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. White 399 So. 2d 172 La. 1981
State v. Dawson 392 So. 2d 445 La. 1980
Defendant complains that the trial court erred in also instructing the jury as to the penalties for the other responsive verdicts to the charge, , (1971).
State v. Hodges 349 So. 2d 250 La. 1977
(1971), we rejected an identical contention that the trial court erred in not allowing defense counsel to read to the jury in his closing argument the penalty provisions of the criminal statute under which he was charged.
State v. Hollingsworth 337 So. 2d 461 La. 1976
15:479; State v. Powell, 213 La.
State v. Prater 337 So. 2d 1107 La. 1976
(1971); State v. Andrus, 250 La.
State v. Lee 331 So. 2d 455 La. 1976
State v. Luckett 327 So. 2d 365 La. 1976
15:481, , (1971); State v. Norphlis, 165 La.
State v. Liesk 326 So. 2d 871 La. 1976
(1971); State v. Andrus, 250 La.
State v. Youngblood 325 So. 2d 250 La. 1975
State v. Babin 319 So. 2d 367 La. 1975
State v. Lewis, La., (1974); , (1971).
State v. Madison 319 So. 2d 912 La. 1975
State v. Hill, La., (1974); State v. Lewis, La., (1974); State v. Blackwell, La., (1973); , (1971); State v. Andrus, 250 La.
State v. George 312 So. 2d 860 La. 1975
State v. Lewis, La., (1974); , (1971).
State v. McGuffey 301 So. 2d 582 La. 1974
State v. Sylvester 298 So. 2d 807 La. 1974
State v. Lewis 296 So. 2d 824 La. 1974
(1971) argument by defense counsel; State v. Andrus, 250 La.
State v. Blackwell 298 So. 2d 798 La. 1974
(1971), and noted that it was the province of the court and not the jurors to determine the punishment, in the event they should find the defendant guilty.
State v. Jones 283 So. 2d 476 La. 1973
777 , (1972); , (1971); State v. Hopper, 251 La.
State v. Smith 283 So. 2d 470 La. 1973
(1971) and my dissent therein.
State v. Rose 271 So. 2d 863 La. 1973
(1971) and the cases cited therein.
State v. Sampson 267 So. 2d 203 La. 1972
605 , ; , ; Crampton v. Ohio, 402 U.S. 183 , 91 S.Ct.
State v. Cryer 263 So. 2d 895 La. 1972
(1971), that the jury has no role in the fixing and imposing of sentences in non-capital cases.