State v. McClure
State v. McClure, 249 So. 2d 109 (La. 1971).
Cited by
- State of Louisiana v. Derrick A. Dotson La. 2017
- State of Louisiana v. Leon D. Fussell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- State v. Fussell 941 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- State v. Gunnells 619 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
- State v. Schlessinger 525 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Comeaux 514 So. 2d 84 La. 1987
- State v. Foster 437 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- State v. Eastin 419 So. 2d 933 La. 1982
- State v. Sonnier 379 So. 2d 1336 La. 1980
- State v. Robinson 353 So. 2d 1001 La. 1977
- State v. Calloway 343 So. 2d 694 La. 1976
- State v. Skelton 340 So. 2d 256 La. 1976
Opinion text
TATE, J., concurs in the result. He does not agree with the statement in footnote 2 that the court cannot consider the evidence on the hearing on the motion to suppress and on the merits, properly identified by reference in the bills, and that the statements in the trial court’s per curiam must be accepted for this reason. However, the evidence so attached shows that the trial court’s construction of the evidence is correct, and so therefore is our conclusion. Likewise, if the search of the suitcase is illegal, it could not be harmless error. Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969). Nevertheless, although the matter might be close, such search may be justified as incident to a lawful arrest based on the probable cause known to the West Monroe officers, who had radioed the Ruston police to stop the cab and its occupants. Cf. Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary, 401 U.S. 560 , 91 S.Ct. 1031, 1037 , 28 L. Ed.2d 306 (1971) (syllabus 8). He therefore concurs.