Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Davis, 249 So. 2d 193.

18 citing documents.

State v. Namias 357 So. 2d 494 La. 1978
State v. Anderson 358 So. 2d 276 La. 1978
42 , (1972); , (1971); State v. Lacoste, 256 La.
State v. Walker 344 So. 2d 990 La. 1977
State v. Junegain, supra; , (1971).
State v. Phillips 343 So. 2d 1047 La. 1977
See Davis v. Heyd, 479 F.2d 446 (CA 5, 1973), , (1971).
State v. Winston 343 So. 2d 171 La. 1977
State v. Junegain, La., (1975); State v. Owens, La., (1974); State v. Ackal, La., (1974); , (1971); State v. Walker, 204 La.
State v. Gallow 338 So. 2d 920 La. 1976
State v. Junegain 324 So. 2d 438 La. 1975
State v. Babin 319 So. 2d 367 La. 1975
Cf., e. g., , 249 * (1971), where this court unanimously held that the prosecution witness statements need not be produced, and Davis v. Heyd, 479 F.2d 446 (C.A.5, 1973), where on federal habeas proceedings the state conviction was set aside.
State v. Lewis 315 So. 2d 626 La. 1975
100 , (1969); Davis v. Heyd, 479 F.2d 446 (CA 5, 1973) (failure to afford pre-trial discovery of statements of prosecution witnesses), , (1971); Clark v. Reid, 441 F.2d 801 (CA 5, 1971) (failure to afford pre-trial opportunity to defendant to conduct scientific analyses of alleged illegal substance possessed by him), with regard to conviction in State v. Clack, 254 La.
State v. Owens 301 So. 2d 591 La. 1974
42 , (1972); , (1971); State v. Lacoste, 256 La.
State v. LeBlanc 297 So. 2d 433 La. 1974
(1971), where we found it was not error for a trial court to curtail cross-examination with regard to an act of violence unrelated to the crime before the bar, we said: "While cross-examination is afforded a broad scope, La.R.S.
State v. Ackal 290 So. 2d 882 La. 1974
15:275; , (1971); State v. Chapman, 251 La.
State v. Thomas 290 So. 2d 317 La. 1974
[2] But see, , (1971), affirming a conviction after reviewing withheld statements which were produced post-trial, as well as the related post-conviction proceedings, which set aside the conviction, on the ground that the prosecution's good faith non-disclosure amounted to a violation of Brady requirements, Davis v. H
State v. Warren 271 So. 2d 527 La. 1973
State v. Edmonson 267 So. 2d 183 La. 1972
(1971); State v. Coney, 258 La.
State v. Curry 264 So. 2d 583 La. 1972
Louisiana law does not require pretrial discovery of statements taken from .potential witnesses, , (1971).
State v. Anderson 259 So. 2d 310 La. 1972
State v. Burkhalter 255 So. 2d 62 La. 1971
(1971); State v. Coney, 258 La.