DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, 251 So. 2d 166.

25 citing documents.

  • Matthew and Jessica Organ v. Carlos J. Juarez individually and Carlos J. Juarez d_b_a Carlos J. Juarez Carpentry … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
    The Organs timely filed this appeal, asserting the trial court erroneously failed to: ( 1) apply the inference of faulty workmanship set forth in Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., So.
  • Lafayette Insurance v. C.E. Albert Construction Co. 731 So. 2d 968 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    as a matter of law.” Lafayette asserts that the court’s failure to find Abert at fault is irrelevant, because Civil Code article 2762, 4 as interpreted in Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., , (1971), and A & M (La.App.
  • Chance v. Stevens of Leesville, Inc. 491 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., , (1971).'
  • Moses v. Ed's Manufactured Housing, Inc. 470 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., , (1971).” (La.App.
  • Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hartzog Realty & Construction Co. 439 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, , (1971).
  • Dearing v. Coleman Oldsmobile, Inc. 423 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., , (1971).” The trial court found that although some of the complaints involved minor adjustments or minor misunderstandings, many involved defects which were present in the motor home at the time of sale.
  • Anselmo v. Chrysler Corporation 414 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., , (1971)."
  • Lokey v. Dixie Buick, Inc. 400 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., , (1971).'" In the present case the large number of defects in the motor home evidenced themselves immediately after the sale, and the plaintiffs were unable to have them repaired in spite of repeated efforts on their part to have Dixie remedy the problems.
  • Wetmore v. Blueridge, Inc. 391 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
    Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, , (1971); A & M Pest Control Service, Inc. v. Fejta Construction Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Dixon Enterprises, Inc. v. Restaurant Products, Inc. 389 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
    Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., , (1971)."
  • John Deere Indus. Equip. Co. v. Willett Timber Co. 380 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., , (1971)."
  • A & M Pest Control Serv., Inc. v. FEJTA CONST. CO. INC. 338 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, , (1971); (La.App.
  • Miller v. Montgomery Ward and Company, Inc. 317 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    1973); Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, , (1971) and Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of New York, 259 La.
  • American Security Ins. Co. v. Griffith's Air Con. 317 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    In Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, , (1971), Justice Hamlin, in a concurring opinion, stated: "I note that in Footnote No. 3 of the majority opinion, it is stated: `Unfortunately, Moorehead's employees, upon removing the broken fulcrum, had sent it to the city dump on the day of or the day after the accident.
  • Young v. Deo Fruge Contractor, Inc. 321 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    Plaintiff contends on this appeal (and apparently did so at trial) that under the principles set forth in Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, , (1971) an inference of faulty workmanship and/or materials arose under the facts of this case and the burden of proof was therefore upon the defendant to establish that the defects and/or damages resulted from causes other than faulty workmanship and/or materials.
  • Townsend v. Cleve Heyl Chevrolet-Buick, Inc. 318 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    In Rey, supra, the Supreme Court referred to Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety, Co., , (1971), establishing as a "similar principle" the inference that faulty workmanship or material caused the failure shortly after delivery of the thing.
  • Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Purvis 316 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    The law of Louisiana is that “an inference of faulty workmanship or material arises when construction designed as a permanent installation fails shortly after being put into use.” Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, , (1971); Town of Slidell v. Temple, 246 La.
  • Pollard v. Roberts 306 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, amended , (1971).
  • Ticheli v. Silmon 304 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
    Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., , (1971)."
  • Rey v. Cuccia 298 So. 2d 840 La. 1974
    Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., , (1971).
  • Bewley Furniture Co., Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. 285 So. 2d 216 La. 1973
    624 , (1967); Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., , (1971); Frees & Laine v. C. W. Vollmer & Co., Inc., (La.
  • Heimbaugh v. Federal Insurance Company 281 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    2 Cir. 1970), amended , (1971).
  • Simon v. Ford Motor Company 282 So. 2d 126 La. 1973
    See concurring opinion (Hamlin, J.) in Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., , (1971).
  • Eckel v. C. T. Patterson Co. 279 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    For somewhat similar injuries see : Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, , ; Nuccio v. Fireman’s Fund American Insurance Cos., La.App., ; Miller v. Rooks, La.App., ; Barker v. Phoenix Insurance Company, La.App., .
  • Case v. Metairie Ford 272 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
    [*] Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, , (1971).