Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Bates, 249 So. 2d 127.

16 citing documents.

Champagne v. Champagne 541 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
where the Louisiana Supreme Court, guided by then-recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions, determined that when a maximum fine of $1000, or imprisonment for not more than 12 months, or both, could have been imposed, a civil contempt proceeding brought against a defendant for practicing medicine
Duplantis v. Monteaux 412 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
"Any of the following acts constitutes a constructive contempt of court: * * * * * * (2) Wilful disobedience of any lawful judgment, order, mandate, writ, or process of the court;" , (1971) "that willful disobedience of any lawful judgment, order, mandate, writ, or process of court is a constructive contempt of court."
Bell v. Bell 386 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Good Hope Refineries, Inc. v. OIL, CHEMICAL ETC. 386 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Finally, Board v. Bates [ ] 249 So.2[d] 127, and Board v. Boisvert [ 258 La.
Dove v. Dove 386 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
State v. Walker 386 So. 2d 908 La. 1980
(1971), where we held that defendant in a contempt proceeding (for violation of an injunction) was entitled to trial by jury because the contempt was punishable by imprisonment for more than six months.
State v. Austin 374 So. 2d 1252 La. 1979
LOUISIANA LIVESTOCK SANITARY BD. v. Johnson 372 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
[ ], , and the United States Supreme Court in Bloom v. Illinois (1968), 391 U.S. 194 , 20 L.Ed.2d 522 , 88 Sup.Ct.
Pettus v. Atchafalaya Wildlife Protective Soc. 351 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
State v. Thigpen 275 So. 2d 760 La. 1973
133 , (1971), , (1971), this Court notes, ex proprio motu our trial brother imposed an illegal sentence.
Discon v. Saray, Inc. 272 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
The Court, in considering the correctness of our decision in dismissing the defendant's appeal for lack of jurisdiction, , (1971), which case made a careful analysis of "criminal contempt" as distinguished from "civil contempt."
Dabezies v. Bourg 273 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Joint Legislative Committee of the Legislature v. Strain 268 So. 2d 629 La. 1972
Section 5 of Title 24 of the Revised Statutes specifically provides that when contempt of the legislature occurs “the district attorney shall institute and prosecute a criminal proceeding against the accused.” , (1971), the similarity between criminal contempt and civil contempt is striking.
Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Doty 258 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
State v. Van Blair 255 So. 2d 355 La. 1971
Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Boisvert 249 So. 2d 132 La. 1971
1886 , 26 L.Ed.2d 437 (1970) and the reasons assigned in Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Bates, La., , handed down this day, we find the trial judge was in error in.denying Boisvert a jury trial in the contempt proceeding.