Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Smith v. Girley, 255 So. 2d 748.

19 citing documents.

Judith Langlinais Mistich v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Smith [v. Girley, ]; Hendricks [v. American Employers Ins.
Mistich v. Weeks 107 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Smith [v. Girley, , ]; Hendricks [v. American Employers Ins.
Aucoin v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 771 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
( , (1971) and Hendricks v. American Employers Ins.
Minor v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 700 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
(1971), the Louisiana Supreme Court dealt with this issue and noted, "Ultimately, of course, the issue becomes one of fact...."
Valentine v. Bonneville Ins. Co. 672 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
(1971), where the policy defined "occupying" as "in or upon, or entering into or alighting from" the vehicle, the supreme court stated that the "physical relationship between [the claimant] and the car enlarged the area defined by the words `entering or alighting' and the word `in'."
Byrne v. State Farm Insurance Co. 572 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
(1971) for the proposition that even though the person injured was not in actual physical contact with the automobile, he may still be within the coverage of the policy.
White v. Williams 563 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
223, (1971) our Courts have looked to the relationship between the plaintiff and the insured vehicle at the time of the accident in addition to actual *1318 physical contact with the vehicle at the moment of the accident.
Washington v. Allstate Ins. Co. 499 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
(1971), a deputy sheriff had stopped to jump start a stalled car.
Martinez v. Great American Ins. Co. 499 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Westerfield v. LaFleur 493 So. 2d 600 La. 1986
Hastings v. International Service Ins. Co. 490 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Westerfield v. LaFleur 480 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Bloodworth v. Carroll 455 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
(1971); Macalusa v. Hartford Acc.
Snider v. Kemper Ins. Co. 448 So. 2d 1383 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
See annotations at 19 ALR 2d 513 and at 42 ALR 3d 501 , , (1971) and in Day v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Inc., (La.App.
Employers Ins. Co. of Wausau v. Dryden 422 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
(1971), if a person is physically in contact with the insured vehicle at the time of injury, he is considered to be "upon" the insured vehicle.
Day v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Inc. 420 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Wheat v. Ford, Bacon and Davis Construction Corp. 414 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
411 , (1963); (1st Cir. 1970), modified , (1971); (4th Cir. 1969).
Breard v. Haynes 394 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
The case of Smith versus Travelers Insurance, [ ,] 255 So.
Austrum v. City of Baton Rouge 267 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
His position is even stronger than those of *290 , (1971) (La.