Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Royal Furniture Company of Baton Rouge v. Benton, 256 So. 2d 614.

27 citing documents.

Matthew A. Hillman v. Corey Seneca La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
However, the Louisiana Supreme Court has held that “the pleadings which lead up to the demand, or prayer, upon which a default judgment is based are to be construed no more restrictively than pleadings suggestive of other judgments.” Royal Furniture Co. of Baton Rouge, (1972).
Hillman v. Seneca 258 So. 3d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Royal Furniture Co. of Baton Rouge, , 532, , 616 (1972).
Mooring Financial Corp. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan v. Mitchell 15 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
Royal Furniture Co. of Baton Rouge, , (1972).
Zachary Financial, Inc. v. Darjean 5 So. 3d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Gaspard v. RAM 983 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Royal Furniture Co. of Baton Rouge, , (1972).
Robert Gaspard v. Gilley Ram La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
However, the Louisiana Supreme Court has held that “the pleadings which lead up to the demand, or prayer, upon which a default judgment is based are to be construed no more restrictively than pleadings suggestive of other judgments.” Royal Furniture Co. of Baton Rouge, (1972).
Arias v. Stolthaven New Orleans, LLC 980 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Royal Furniture Co. of Baton Rouge, , (1972).
Smart Document Solutions, LLC v. Miller 970 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Royal Furniture Co. of Baton Rouge, , (1972).
Smart Document Solutions, LLC v. Michael B. Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
However, the Louisiana Supreme Court has held that “the pleadings which lead up to the demand, or prayer, upon which a default judgment is based are to be construed no more restrictively than pleadings suggestive of other judgments.” Royal Furniture Co. of Baton Rouge, (1972).
Marshall v. East Jefferson General Hospital Foundation 963 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Cunningham v. M & S MARINE, INC. 923 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Royal Furniture Co. of Baton Rouge, , (1972).
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co. 857 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Royal Furniture Co. of Baton Rouge, , (1972).
Allain v. Martco Partnership 828 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Brewhouse, Ltd. v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 614 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
First South Prod. Cr. v. Georgia-Pacific 585 So. 2d 545 La. 1991
Heroman, & Co., , (La.
Alphonso v. Cement Product Services, Inc. 499 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
1703 and 4831; , (1972); (La.App.
Sunseri v. Gilchress 480 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
(1972); Cox v. W. M. Heroman & Co., Inc., writ refused ” (La.App.
Goodson v. Sills 470 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
art. 865; Royal Furniture Co. v. *969 Benton, , (1972) (citations omitted).
Edmond v. Webre 413 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
See Albritton v. McDonald, supra; , (1972).
Succession of Hearn 412 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
(1972); Cox v. W. M. Heroman & Co., Inc., (La.
Garrett v. Walker 407 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
and Failla v. Grandeury, [La.App.]
P.H.A.C. Services, Inc. v. Seaways International, Inc. 393 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
...” , (1972), the Louisiana Supreme Court, quoting La.C.C.P.
Strange v. Ivey 369 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Albritton v. McDonald 363 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
(1972); Townsend v. Cleve Heyl Chevrolet-Buick, Inc., (La.App.
Failla v. Grandeury 295 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
American National Bank of Beaumont v. Rathburn 264 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
2 Cir. 1953); , (1972).” The evidence does not show, and plaintiff does not argue, that the purchases made on this credit card were for “necessaries.” The record also does not show that defendant ever ratified the purchases made on that account.
Watson v. Veuleman 260 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972