Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Gladden, 257 So. 2d 388.
- State v. Soukup 275 So. 2d 179 La. 1973
-
State v. Edgecombe
275 So. 2d 740
La. 1973
See, , ; State v. Bailey, 261 La.
-
State v. Odom
273 So. 2d 261
La. 1973
at 396 (1972); "The chain of custody or connexity of the evidence is a matter for the jury to decide, so long as the objects introduced are shown to be reasonably connected with the defendant or the crime and have some relevancy which the trial judge considers sufficient to warrant their introduction i
-
State v. Brevelle
270 So. 2d 852
La. 1972
(1972); Giles v. Maryland, supra, and Brady v. Maryland, supra.
- State v. Refuge 270 So. 2d 842 La. 1972
- State v. Ranker 269 So. 2d 812 La. 1972
- State v. Roddy 270 So. 2d 508 La. 1972
- State v. Franklin 268 So. 2d 249 La. 1972
-
State v. Bailey
261 So. 2d 583
La. 1972
decided January 17, 1972, distinguishes Brady, and what we said there is applicable here.
-
State v. Bailey
261 So. 2d 583
La. 1972
decided January 17, 1972, distinguishes Brady, and what we said there is applicable here.