Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dupaquier v. City of New Orleans, 257 So. 2d 385.

42 citing documents.

Toni Marie Jones v. Progressive Baptist Church of Louisiana and Church Mutual Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Robin Larocca v. Primesource Building Products and ESIS La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Mule v. St. Bernard Parish Fire Dep't 259 So. 3d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2 Cir. 11/1/00) ], 771 So.2d [234,] 235-36 ; Dupaquier v. City of New Orleans , , 734, , 387-88 (1972).
Safford v. Hammerman & Gainer International, Inc. 198 So. 3d 227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Causby v. Perque Floor Covering, 97-1235, p. 10 (La.01/21/98), ; see also Millican, 34,207 at p. 2, 771 So.2d at 235-36 ; , -88 (1972).
Nickerson v. Finance America of LA 110 So. 3d 1216 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Dupre v. Surbo Tubular Services, Inc. 113 So. 3d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
-88 (1972) (“When, however, the employer lulls the employee into a false sense of security, causing him to withhold suit until after the [prescriptive] period has expired, the employer cannot invoke the time bar to defeat compensation.”) Mr. Dupre contends that he had no reason to file suit as medi
City of Bossier City v. Colvin 36 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Norman v. Bellsouth Telecommunications 888 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Broussard v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 834 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Kennedy v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 803 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
In support of her argument that an employer may not lull an employee into a false sense of security and thereby cause him to withhold suit until after the prescriptive period, , (1972).
Richardson v. Tyson Foods 796 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
(1972) (prescription interrupted where plaintiff was led to believe that full sick leave benefits he was receiving included workers' compensation benefits).
Causby v. Perque Floor Covering 707 So. 2d 23 La. 1998
) (prescription interrupted where plaintiff was led to believe that full sick leave benefits he was receiving included workers' compensation benefits).
Causby v. Perque Floor Covering 694 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
762 , (1966); , (1972); Baker v. Grinnell Fire Protection Systems, Inc., (La.App.
Desselle v. Dresser Indus. Valve 689 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
App. 5th Cir.1988)], , (1972).
Chevalier v. Bossier 663 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Siemssen v. Manpower Temporary Services 656 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
5th Cir.1988) [ , (1972)]; See also: Bledsoe, 643 So.2d at 1304 .
Williams v. William Wrigley, Jr. Co. 646 So. 2d 1092 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
762 , (1966); , (1972); Baker v. Grinnell Fire Protection Systems, Inc., (La.
Krieg v. Krieg Bros. Terrazzo Co., Inc. 645 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Explained Bledsoe v. Willowdale Country Club 643 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
5th Cir.1988) at 962 [ , (1972)].
Davis v. United General Ins. Co. 631 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
1st Cir.1990); Latino, supra, at 962 , , (1972).
Reeves v. Reeves Dirt Pit 606 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Warren v. H & W Steel Erectors Inc. 569 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Latino v. Binswanger Glass Co. 532 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Melancon v. Lone Star Industries, Inc. 503 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Baker v. Grinnell Fire Protection Systems, Inc. 487 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Schulin v. Service Painting Co. of Louisiana 479 So. 2d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Foster v. Manville Forest Products Corp. 465 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Appellant further argues that he withheld suit beyond the one year prescriptive period because of a false sense of security created by representations of defendant's employees and receipt of the long term disability payments, , (1972) in support of this position.
Comardelle v. Jeandron Chevrolet, Inc. 449 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
(1972), rehearing denied 1972.
Wesley v. Claiborne Elec. Co-Op, Inc. 446 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Erwin v. Agrico Chemical Co. of Delaware 422 So. 2d 1385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
*1387 App.4th Cir.1977), writ denied, where the employee shows that he was lulled into a false sense of security and thereby discouraged from filing a lawsuit, , (1972), or even where the employer innocently sets up circumstances such that the employee could reasonably believe he was receiving compensation benefits and thereby delays filing a lawsuit, (La.App.
Chapman v. Belden Corp. 414 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Lester v. Rebel Crane & Service Co. 394 So. 2d 1230 La. 1981
(1972); Blanchard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., La.
Johnson v. Morton Salt Co. 377 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
(1972), the court stated: "The purpose of the one year prescription is to protect employers from the burdensome litigation of stale claims.
Wright v. Aetna Life & Cas. Co. 360 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Sewell v. Argonaut-Southwest Ins. Co. 338 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Drane v. City of New Orleans 328 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
To avoid dismissal because of prescription, plaintiff argues in this court that he was led to believe his claim for compensation did not have to be filed while he was on active duty collecting full wages as sick pay, similar to the situation in Dupaquier *754 v. City of New Orleans, , (1972).
Byrd v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. 314 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Appellant theorizes that the employer is estopped from invoking the time bar, as in Dupaquier v. City of New Orleans, 1972, , .
Ray v. City of New Orleans 284 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
Ryder v. Insurance Company of North America 282 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Dupaquier v. City of New Orleans 271 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Price v. Gas & Well Operating Service 267 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
(1972) where the court stated the law with citation of authorities as follows: “The purpose of the one year prescriptive period is to protect' employers from the burdensome litigation of stale claims.
Landry v. Ferguson 264 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
(1972) and the authorities cited therein.