DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Graham v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa., 259 So. 2d 22.

58 citing documents.

  • Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana v. State Farm 839 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Co. of Reading, Pa., , (1972); Malone & Johnson, 15 La.
  • Livas v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 797 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Co. of Reading, Penn., , (1972).
  • Gentry v. Meade 767 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • Valentine v. Bonneville Ins. Co. 672 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • Roberts v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 662 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    Co., , (1972); Malone & Johnson, 15 La.Civil Law Treatise (Insurance Law & Practice), § 4.
  • Fay v. Willis 577 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    686 , (1972); Graham v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa., , (1972).
  • Lee v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. of America 571 So. 2d 127 La. 1990
  • Stewart v. Robinson 521 So. 2d 1241 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    Graham [ v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa., , (1972)] and Deane [ v. McGee, 261 La.
  • Carroll v. State Farm Ins. Co. 519 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    Graham v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa., , (1972).
  • Southern American Ins. Co. v. Dobson 441 So. 2d 1185 La. 1983
    521, 527-29 , -84 (1968) (action against insurer to recover under uninsured motorist policy terms held to prescribe in ten years, not one); Graham v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pa., -94 , -25 (1972) (pro rata clauses which attempt to reduce the mandatory minimum coverage under a policy held invalid); Veal v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co., -97 (La.1975) (uninsured motorist statute applies to "unauthorized" insurers who issue policies through surplus line b
  • Block v. Reliance Ins. Co. 433 So. 2d 1040 La. 1983
    To assure that the injured person has a better opportunity for adequate compensation, this court in Graham v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa., , (1972), and in Deane v. McGee, 261 La.
  • Clement v. Continental Ins. Co. 430 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Nall, supra ; Graham v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa., , (1972).
  • Abel v. White 430 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    It was only because of the Louisiana statute that the Louisiana supreme court, , invalidated "other insurance" clauses that would have prorated the statutorily required UM minimum among three separate policies (each insuring the same person in respect to a different vehicle), and that thus would have allowed each policy to provide only a third of the statutory minimum.
  • Wright v. Aetna Casualty Insurance 428 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Graham v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa., , enunciated that holding, which was effective for uninsured motorist *853 coverage in general until a 1977 amendment to R.S.
  • Breaux v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. 413 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Barbin v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Graham v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, , (1972)...."
  • Robertson v. Travis 412 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    See Graham v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, , (1972).
  • Wattigney v. Government Employees Insurance Co. 407 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    The trial judge then correctly determined that the total amount of uninsured motorists coverage was $80,-000.00 in accordance with the concept of “stacking” , (1972); and Deane v. McGee, 261 La.
  • Hubbard v. Milner 408 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
    686 , *1006 (1972); , (1972).
  • Burns v. Fernandez 401 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    See Graham v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa., , (1972); Deane v. McGee, 261 La.
  • Vega v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. 401 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    The issue before us under the policy provision quoted above was addressed in Graham v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, , (1972).
  • Branch v. O'BRIEN 396 So. 2d 1372 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
    Barbin v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Graham v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, , (1972); Deane v. McGee, 261 La.
  • Hebert v. Ordoyne 388 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    684 , (1972) and Graham v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, , (1972), stand for the proposition that while an uninsured motorist policy must be written in the minimum legal amount, an insured may contractually arrange for greater coverage.
  • Hickerson v. Protective Nat. Ins. Co. 383 So. 2d 377 La. 1980
    Graham v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa., , (1972); Deane v. McGee, 261 La.
  • Cutrer v. Brumfield 372 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    22:1406(D), prior to its amendment by Act 623 of 1977; Graham v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa., , (1972).
  • Breaux v. Government Emp. Ins. Co. 369 So. 2d 1335 La. 1979
    686 , (1972); Graham v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa., , (1972).
  • Manual v. American Indem. Co. 368 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    Graham v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, , (1972); Deane v. McGee, 261 La.
  • Briley v. Falati 367 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    Barbin states that: "* * * (T)he clear intent of Graham [v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Penn., , ], Deane, and the other cited cases is to the effect that if a plaintiff is issued insurance on two or more automobiles, pays premiums for two or more different uninsured motorist coverages, and sustains damages thereunder in excess of the mandatory minimal coverage, he can `stack' coverages and recover
  • Breaux v. Government Employees Insurance 364 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    686 , (1972); Graham v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, , (1972); Guillot v. Travelers Indemnity Company, supra.
  • Casey v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America 360 So. 2d 1386 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    Graham v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, , (1972); Deane v. McGee, 261 La.
  • Anderson v. West 354 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    22:1406 D , (1972), Deane v. McGee, 261 La.
  • Robertson v. Cumis Ins. Co. 355 So. 2d 1371 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    A case very similar to our case was decided by the Louisiana Supreme Court in 1972: Graham v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa., , (1972).
  • Guillot v. Travelers Indem. Co. 338 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    686 , (1972); Graham v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, , (1972); "
  • Thornton v. Moran 341 So. 2d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    App., 1972), , (1972) and Deane v. McGee, 261 La.
  • Seaton v. Kelly 339 So. 2d 731 La. 1976
    See e.g. Graham v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa., , (1972); Deane v. McGee, 261 La.
  • Posey v. Commercial Union Insurance Company 332 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
    [1] Graham v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa., , (1972); Deane v. McGee, 261 La.
  • Raggio v. Volkswagen Insurance Co. 327 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    Graham v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa., , (1972) is the fountainhead.
  • Veal v. Interstate Fire and Casualty Company 325 So. 2d 795 La. 1976
    686 , (1972); , 259 So.2d (1972).
  • Phillips v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 325 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    (1972); Deane v. McGee, 261 La.
  • Phillips v. Barraza 320 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    Since the recent cases of Graham v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, , (1972), and Deane v. McGee, 261 La.
  • Bourgeois v. Government Employees Insurance Co. 316 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    In Graham v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, , (1972), the Supreme Court the Supreme Court held that an "other insurance clause," or "pro rata" clause, could not be employed to reduce the uninsured motorist coverage of insurance below the statutory minimum.
  • Landry v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. 320 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    185 , (1972); Deane v. McGee, 261 La.
  • Barbin v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 315 So. 2d 754 La. 1975
    The principal issue before us is whether a 1972 amendment legislatively overruled our decision in Graham v. American *756 Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, , (1972).
  • Brister v. American Indemnity Company 313 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    Appellant reasons that our decision in Thomas was "apparently" ( 3 La.App., 1972 ), , (1972), and Deane v. McGee, 261 La.
  • Hebert v. Green 311 So. 2d 223 La. 1975
    (1972) this Court considered a "pro rata" clause which, if given effect, would have allowed only a total of $5,000 to be recovered (even though actual damages exceeded $5,000) under the uninsured motorist provisions of three independent (and applicable) policies, each providing $5,000 in uninsured motor
  • Doucet v. Insurance Company of North America 302 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    Graham v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa., , (1972); Deane v. McGee, 261 La.
  • Barbin v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company 302 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    Graham v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa., , (1972) held that insurance policies must conform with statutory requirements.
  • Curry v. Travelers Insurance Company 301 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
    He cites Graham v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa., , (1972); Deane v. McGee, 261 La.
  • Wilkinson v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 298 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    686 , (1972), , (1972), , (La.App.
  • Moreau v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO 298 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    686 , (1972); Graham v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pa., , (1972); (La.App.
  • Thomas v. Nelson 295 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    686 , (1972); Graham v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, , (1972); (La.App.