DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 256 So. 2d 620.

403 citing documents.

  • Graham v. STATE, HEALTH & SOCIAL, ETC. 354 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    See also Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Frank v. Pitre 353 So. 2d 1293 La. 1977
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Dixie Drive-It-Yourself System v. American Beverage Co., 242 La.
  • Davis v. Reliance Elec. Co. 351 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    In considering the extent to which legal consequences flow from an alleged act of negligence, the Supreme Court in Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., stated: ( , at 623 ) ".
  • Ducote v. Voorhies 350 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Laird v. Travelers Insurance Company, 263 La.
  • Williams v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF COR. 351 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972), and all of its progeny.
  • Trahan v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 348 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    471 , (1970); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Foss v. New Orleans Terminal Co. 351 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    What we perceive to be missing here is a vital link in the proof of a
  • Owens v. New Orleans Bldg. Maintenance, Inc. 349 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    THE NEGLIGENCE OF DEFENDANTS Defendants contend that they should be exonerated from liability on the basis of the duty risk formula of tort liability as set forth in the Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972) and Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Company, 242 La.
  • Lacour v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. 349 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, (1976); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Company, 242 La.
  • Musso v. ST. MARY PARISH HOSPITAL SERVICE DIST. 345 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Smolinski v. Taulli, La., (1973); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Lewis v. Kehoe Academy 346 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, , (1972).
  • Geisler v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 346 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Company, 257 La.
  • Straley v. Calongne Drayage and Storage, Inc. 346 So. 2d 171 La. 1977
    Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Hill v. Lundin & Asso., Inc., , (1972).
  • Tiger Well Service, Inc. v. Travelers Ins. Co. 343 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Gansloser v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. 339 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
    1st Cir. 1957) writ refused; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972), and particularly Dialogues on Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 34 L.L.R.
  • G. VIDRINE v. Missouri Farm Association 339 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    Stewart v. Gibson Products Company of Natchitoches Parish Louisiana, Inc., Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
  • Frank v. Pitre 341 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    A determination as to whether, under the circumstances of this case, defendant bears any responsibility to plaintiff for the injuries sustained must be reached by application of the duty-risk inquiry as espoused in Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • General Credit Plan, Inc. v. Pearson 341 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    However, we go one step further: In Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , , in considering the extent to which legal consequences flow after an alleged act of negligence, the court stated: “.
  • Dyson v. Gulf Modular Corp. 338 So. 2d 1385 La. 1976
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , 256 * (1972); Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Company, 257 La.
  • Skipper v. New Orleans Public Serv., Inc. 338 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, , (1972).
  • Mondello v. State ex rel. Department of Highways 338 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Ford v. Knight 337 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); and Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Co., 257 La.
  • Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company 334 So. 2d 406 La. 1976
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Company, 242 La.
  • Callais v. Allstate Insurance Co. 334 So. 2d 692 La. 1976
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Prosser, Law of Torts § 36, pp. 192-197 (4th ed. 1971); Malone, Ruminations on Cause-In-Fact, 9 Stanford L.Rev.
  • Scott v. IL Lyons & Co., Ltd. 329 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Woodward v. First of Georgia Ins. Co. 333 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
    See Hill v. Lundin and Associates, Inc., , (1972) and 34 La.L.Rev.
  • Burley v. Louisiana Power & Light Company 327 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    However, under our jurisprudence, as reflected by the cases of Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972), Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Company, 257 La.
  • Wunstell v. Crochet 325 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    [4] Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Malone, Ruminations on Cause-In-Fact, 9 Stanford L.Rev.
  • Haas v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company 321 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Prosser, Handbook of the Law of Torts, Ch. 7 (4th Ed. 1971).
  • Ayala v. Bailey Electric Company, Inc. 318 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Malone, Ruminations on Cause-in-Fact, 9 Stanford L.Rev.
  • Thomas v. Hanover Insurance Company 321 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    Jones v. Robbins, La., (S.Ct.1974); Hill v. Lundin, La., (S.Ct.1972).
  • Simmons v. Beauregard Parish School Board 315 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    See also Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Sevin v. Diamond M Drilling Co.
  • Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 322 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    471 , (1962), and Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972), the courts of Louisiana have been applying the “duty-risk” approach to determine the existence of liability.
  • Lee v. Vidrine 316 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972) citing Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Company, 257 La.
  • Raphile v. Alexander 315 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Company, 257 La.
  • Linnear v. Wilson 312 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Tri-State Ins. Co. v. Tidewater Trailer Mfg. Co. 312 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Company, 257 La.
  • Gore v. Miller 311 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    See: Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Laird v. Travelers Insurance Co., 263 La.
  • Fontenot v. Ludeau 309 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Page v. Green 306 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    Hill v. Lundin Associates, Inc., , (1972); Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Company, 257 La.
  • Mixon v. Allstate Insurance Company 300 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Ardoin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 302 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Contranchis v. Parish of Jefferson 299 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Co., 257 La.
  • Simmons v. Travelers Insurance Company 295 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    Stated in terms of the duty-risk approach used in our recent Supreme Court decisions, Hill v. Lundin Associates, Inc., , (1972) and cases cited therein, the duty not to manufacture defective materials does not protect against the risk that workmen while installing such materials may be injured by some cause unrelated to the defect.
  • Stewart v. GIBSON PROD. CO. OF NATCHITOCHES PARISH LA., INC. 300 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).
  • Murray v. Volkswagen Mid-American, Inc. 297 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    199 , (1972); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Co., 257 La.
  • Abshire v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Ins. Co. 289 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    See also: Smolinski v. Taulli, 276 So.2d *548 286 (La.1973); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Co., 257 La.
  • Jones v. Robbins 289 So. 2d 104 La. 1974
    (1972); Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Co., 257 La.
  • Canter v. Koehring Company 283 So. 2d 716 La. 1973
    *723 Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972); Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Co., 257 La.
  • Wilson v. Allstate Insurance Company 278 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
    Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., , (1972).