DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Walters, 259 So. 2d 12.

14 citing documents.

  • Succession of Cladie J. Wade La. 2025
    In cases involving null provisions of a will, “the invalidity of a portion of a will does not invalidate the will in its entirety.” (La.
  • Succession of Cladie J. Wade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
  • Dupuy v. Walther 721 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • Succession of Wallace 574 So. 2d 348 La. 1991
  • Succession of Flowers 532 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Succession of Jenkins 481 So. 2d 607 La. 1986
  • Succession of Goode 425 So. 2d 673 La. 1982
    439, 489; A. Yiannopoulos, above; , (1972), Barham, J., Concurring; Crichton v. Succession of Gredler, 256 La.
  • Succession of Goode 395 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Art. 1520 sanctioned by the jurisprudence is “to the effect that the nullity of a bequest, as containing a prohibited substitution, does not offset the enforceability of the other valid provisions of the will, which are regular as to form.” , (1972).
  • Baten v. Taylor 386 So. 2d 333 La. 1979
    See, , (1972) (Barham, J., concurring); Crichton v. Succession of Gredler, 256 La.
  • Succession of Gardiner 366 So. 2d 1065 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    (1972); Carter v. Succn.
  • Succession of Gwathmey 364 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
  • Taylor v. Baten 364 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
  • Succession of Burgess 359 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    (1972), but the validity of the residual trusts alone is to be considered.
  • Succession of Stewart 301 So. 2d 872 La. 1974
    In , (1972), this Court was not faced with the issue as to whether the will there under attack contained a prohibited substitution, for that decision had already been made in the affirmative by the courts below and was not contested before this Court.