DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Estes v. Estes, 258 So. 2d 857.

63 citing documents.

  • Hilliard v. Richard 291 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    (1972) our Supreme Court quoted from Fulco v. Fulco, 259 La.
  • Earnest v. Earnest 286 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    [2] , (1972), where he observes that the above quote "speaks of the paramount right of the mother in the cases where change of custody is sought from the mother to the father," and is thus inapplicable in cases where custoday has not been determined by the court.
  • Henderson v. Boudreaux 290 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    (1972), as follows: “ * * * If the trial court decides which parent should best have custody for the children’s sake after it has applied correct principles of law, a reviewing court should disturb such custody determination only where there is a clear abuse of the trial court’s discretion in the
  • Gonzaque v. Samuels 284 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    1122 , (1971) , (1972) our Supreme Court stated that the paramount consideration in determining custody is always the welfare and best interest of the children.
  • Abreo v. Abreo 281 So. 2d 695 La. 1973
    Most recently, , 258 * (1972).
  • Nieto v. NEITO 276 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
  • Gustin v. Rouillier 275 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    (1972); Fulco v. Fulco, 259 La.
  • Payne v. Payne 274 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    1122 , (1971); , 258 So.
  • Poole v. Poole 270 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    (1972), the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana stated: "* * * In Fulco v. Fulco, 259 La.
  • Bass v. Abreo 267 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    (1972), although the dissenting justice pointed out that there is less reason in this day and time for granting this preference.
  • Rayner v. Rayner 263 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    1122 , ; , , stating that: (3) When the trial court has made a considered decree of permanent custody in the light of the above principles, even though such custody is subject to modification at any time when a change of conditions demands it, the party seeking the change bears a heavy burden of proving that the
  • Nolte v. Nolte 260 So. 2d 321 La. 1972
    See also my dissent in Estes v. Estes, 1972, , .
  • Penton v. Penton 260 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    Following the latest expression of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, handed down February 21, 1972, , (1972), this court reverses the decision of the lower court and awards custody of the child Kenneth Paul Penton to his mother Lucille Passman Burris, with proper visitation rights in the father Roy Penton.