DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Pierre, 259 So. 2d 6.

26 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Michael W. Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    the supreme court discussed the flight doctrine; in so doing, it seemed to distinguish evading imminent arrest from escaping from legal custody.
  • State v. Smith 2 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    (1972), the supreme court discussed the flight doctrine; in so doing, it seemed to distinguish evading imminent arrest from escaping from legal custody.
  • State v. Carter 712 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Samuels 657 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Thomas 406 So. 2d 1325 La. 1981
  • State v. Namias 357 So. 2d 494 La. 1978
    15:435; , (1972); State v. Davis, 259 La.
  • State v. Anderson 358 So. 2d 276 La. 1978
    (1972); State v. Davis, 259 La.
  • State v. Walker 344 So. 2d 990 La. 1977
  • State v. Gallow 338 So. 2d 920 La. 1976
    State v. Owens, La., ; , (1972); State v. Davis, 259 La.
  • State v. Pickett 325 So. 2d 252 La. 1975
  • State v. Junegain 324 So. 2d 438 La. 1975
  • State v. Nero 319 So. 2d 303 La. 1975
  • State v. Williams 310 So. 2d 528 La. 1975
    777 , (1972); , (1972); State v. Richey, supra; State v. Amphy, supra; State v. Pratt, 255 La.
  • State v. Owens 301 So. 2d 591 La. 1974
    (1972); State v. Davis, 259 La.
  • State v. Brooks 294 So. 2d 503 La. 1974
    (1972); State v. Franklin, 255 La.
  • State v. Lane 292 So. 2d 711 La. 1974
    153 , (1972); , (1972); State v. Johnson, 249 La.
  • State v. Baggett 292 So. 2d 201 La. 1974
    967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); , (1972); State v. Amphy, 259 La.
  • State v. McAllister 285 So. 2d 197 La. 1973
  • State v. Jefferson 284 So. 2d 577 La. 1973
  • State v. Moseley 284 So. 2d 749 La. 1973
    777 , (1972); , (1972); State v. Richey, supra; State v. Amphy, supra; State v. Pratt, 255 La.
  • State v. Womack 283 So. 2d 708 La. 1973
    (1972) and the authorities therein cited.
  • State v. Newman 283 So. 2d 756 La. 1973
    777 , (1972); , (1972); State v. Richey, supra; State v. Amphy, supra; State v. Pratt, 255 La.
  • State v. Beach 279 So. 2d 657 La. 1973
    (1972), in which this Court approved a procedure similar to that employed in this case to obtain the testimony of a former co-defendant turned state's witness.
  • State v. Neal 275 So. 2d 765 La. 1973
    830 , (1970), , (1972), this Court held: "* * * The jury was made well aware that the witness was not making a positive identification of the accused as one of the persons seen by him, but only that he fit the general description of such persons.
  • State v. Edgecombe 275 So. 2d 740 La. 1973
  • State v. Wilkerson 259 So. 2d 871 La. 1972
    her property, or documents, books, papers or other writings” obtained as a result of “an unconstitutional search or seizure,” or “a written confession or written inculpatory statement” on “any ground that would make it inadmissible in evidence.” , , decided February 21, 1972; State v. Jackson, 259 La.