Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Boudreaux v. American Insurance Company, 264 So. 2d 621.
-
Genevieve Moore v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agriculture and Mechanical College O/B/O Lsu Health …
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
1979); So.2d 621, 636 (1972)).
- Mitchell v. Aaron's Rentals 218 So. 3d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
Christy v. McCalla
79 So. 3d 293
La. 2011
Co., , (1972) (“Probabilities, surmises, speculations, and conjectures cannot be accepted as sufficient grounds to justify a recovery to a plaintiff who is charged with the burden of proof”).
-
Randy Williams v. Iesi-La Corporation
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Cangelosi, 564 So.2d at 664; -38, -27 (1972).
- Wimberly v. Giglio 57 So. 3d 389 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
-
Kevin Campbell, Et Ux. v. Coast Concrete Services, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Cangelosi, 564 So.2d at 664; Boudreaux v. 4 American Insurance Co., -38, -27 (1972).
-
Campbell v. Coast Concrete Services, Inc.
51 So. 3d 168
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Cangelosi, 564 So.2d at 664 ; -38 , -27 (1972).
-
Holmes v. Hicks
24 So. 3d 1031
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
(1972); Short v. Plantation Management Corporation, XXXX-XXXX (La.
- Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc. 16 So. 3d 1065 La. 2009
-
Hanks v. Entergy Corp.
944 So. 2d 564
La. 2006
Cangelosi, 564 So.2d at 664 ; -38 , -27 (1972).
- Comeaux v. LAFAYETTE GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER 944 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Deedra Comeaux v. Lafayette General Medical Center, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
Salvant v. State
935 So. 2d 646
La. 2006
"The doctrine applies only when the facts of the controversy `suggest negligence of the defendant, rather than some other factor, as the most plausible explanation of the accident.'" (citing Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., , (1972)).
-
Cooper v. Public Belt Railroad
886 So. 2d 531
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Co., , (1972), on rehearing.
- Crutchfield v. Landry 870 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
- Talbot v. Talbot 864 So. 2d 590 La. 2003
- Wood v. Spillers 843 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- Colgate v. Mughal Bros., Inc. 836 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- Short v. Plantation Management Corp. 781 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- Williamson v. ST. FRANCIS CABRINI HOSP. 763 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
- Precht v. Case Corp. 756 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
- Smith v. Toys" R" US, Inc. 754 So. 2d 209 La. 1999
- Griffin v. HCA Highland Hosp., Inc. 732 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
-
US Fidelity and Guar. Co. v. Hurley
698 So. 2d 482
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
(1972) (on rehearing); (La.App.
- Picou v. Equifax Services, Inc. 690 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
- Shahine v. State Univ. Med. Center 680 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- Filasek v. Doctor's Hospital of Jefferson 673 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
-
Ferruzzi, USA, Inc. v. RJ Tricon Co.
645 So. 2d 685
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
(1972), as follows: Further, as we specifically held in Naquin v. Marquette Casualty Co., 244 La.
-
Aetna Life and Cas. Co. v. Solloway
630 So. 2d 1353
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
(1972) (citations omitted).
- Cay v. STATE, DOTD 631 So. 2d 393 La. 1994
- State Farm v. Wrap-On Co. 626 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
-
LaCombe v. Dr. Walter Olin Moss Reg. Hosp.
617 So. 2d 612
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
The doctrine permits, but does not require, the trier of fact to infer negligence from the circumstances of the event.8 McCormick on Evidence, supra, § 342, at 967; Boudreaux v. American Insurance Co., supra [, , (1972) ]; Larkin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., supra [ 233 La.
- Galloway v. Baton Rouge General Hosp. 602 So. 2d 1003 La. 1992
-
Spott v. Otis Elevator Co.
601 So. 2d 1355
La. 1992
Co., , (1972), on rehearing.
- Gatti v. City of Shreveport 599 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- Westridge v. Poydras Properties 598 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
- Leger v. Citron Ford, Inc. 589 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Viviano v. Arceneaux 572 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Eugene v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 570 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
-
Lucas v. St. Frances Cabrini Hosp.
562 So. 2d 999
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
McCormick on Evidence, supra, § 342, at 967; Boudreaux v. American Insurance Co., [ , (1972)] supra; Larkin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., [ 233 La.
- Cangelosi v. OUR LADY OF LAKE REG. MED. CTR. 564 So. 2d 654 La. 1990
- Massey ex rel. Massey v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc. 557 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-
Hollier v. Lay Down Service, Inc.
554 So. 2d 746
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Any lesser test would allow the jury to rest a verdict on speculation or conjecture.” Furthermore, , (1972), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated 264 So.2d at pages 635-636: “...
- Fox v. OUR LADY OF LOURDES REGIONAL MED. CTR. 550 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- Fox v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center 550 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Louis Dreyfus Corp. v. Continental Grain Co. 542 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Pool v. Missouri Pacific RR Co. 541 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- Montgomery v. Opelousas General Hosp. 540 So. 2d 312 La. 1989
- Pace v. Loyal Order of Moose, Metairie Lodge 2195 538 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Villaronga v. Gelpi Partnership Number 3 536 So. 2d 1307 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988