Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Jackson v. Henderson, 255 So. 2d 85.

219 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Charles Dewayne Williams La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Cleveland E. Richardson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana v. Darryl Puderer La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
  • State of Louisiana v. George Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    So.2d 85 (1971), we acknowledged that the rule reflected a minority view, that a majority of state decisions required “only that the trial judge canvass the matter with the defendant to verify that the plea is freely and understandingly made,” and that the rule was not constitutionally required.
  • State Of Louisiana v. James Toomey La. 2021
  • State Of Louisiana v. Aaron Wayne Bush La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
    198 1) ( wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court extended the three - So.
  • State of Louisiana v. Desmond C. Parker La. 2019
  • State v. Gallagher 249 So. 3d 915 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    Jackson v. Henderson , , (1971).
  • State v. Bradham 246 So. 3d 775 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
    Jackson v. Henderson , , (1971) ; State v. Monroe , 25,825 (La.
  • State v. Carroll 224 So. 3d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Casaday 223 So. 3d 108 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    (1971), formally applied the three-right rule of Boykin v. Alabama, supra, to Louisiana state cases.
  • State v. Johnston 198 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Billups 188 So. 3d 1124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    (1971), sets out a “magic- word formula” which may “serve as a technical trap for conscientious trial judges who conduct a thorough inquiry into the validity of the plea....
  • State v. Small 189 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Kent 178 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    (1971), set out a “magic word formula” which may “serve as a technical trap for conscientious trial judges who conduct a thorough inquiry into the validity of the plea_” Menden-hall, supra, at 560.
  • State ex rel. D.M. 177 So. 3d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Lee 171 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969), , (1971).
  • State v. Mead 165 So. 3d 1044 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Smith 167 So. 3d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    (1971); he must show that his guilty plea was not voluntary as a constitutional matter, i.e., that it did not represent a knowing and voluntary choice among available alternatives.
  • State v. Watkins 146 So. 3d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Hager 148 So. 3d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Dominick 129 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); , (1971).
  • State v. Jones 125 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    (1971); State v. Nuccio, supra.
  • State v. Jones 123 So. 3d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    (1971); State v. Nuccio, supra.
  • State v. Tatten 116 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Jackson [v. Henderson]'s, [ *848 (La.1971) ] requirements were met where the written waiver of rights/plea of guilty form signed by defendant and his attorney stated that the attorney had informed defendant of his privilege against self-incrimination and that defendant had voluntarily waived it.
  • State v. Joseph 95 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); , (1971).
  • State v. Young 71 So. 3d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); , (1971).
  • State v. Causey 67 So. 3d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); , (1971).
  • State of Louisiana v. Jarman Gerard Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    citing Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct.
  • State v. Jones 63 So. 3d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    So.2d 85, 89 (1971), citing Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct.
  • State v. Mosley 54 So. 3d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Darrell James Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    So.2d 85 (1971), sets out a “magic word formula” which may “serve as a technical trap for conscientious trial judges who conduct a thorough inquiry into the validity of the plea....”
  • State v. MARKRAY 35 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Holden 32 So. 3d 803 La. 2010
    (1971), sets out a “magic word formula” which may “serve as a technical trap for conscientious trial judges who conduct a thorough inquiry into the validity of the plea.”
  • State of Louisiana v. Juane Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Farinas 28 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Holden 11 So. 3d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    (1971) the Supreme Court, in expounding on Boykin, held that "in taking a plea of guilty, an express and knowing waiver of at least these three federal constitutional rights must be made, which waiver cannot be presumed.'" (Emphasis added) Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 556.1(D) p
  • State v. Balsano 11 So. 3d 475 La. 2009
    (1971), we acknowledged that the rule reflected a minority view, that a majority of state decisions required “only that the trial judge canvass the matter with the defendant to verify that the plea is freely and understandingly made,” and that the rule was not constitutionally required.
  • State v. Jones 9 So. 3d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    (1971), and the waiver must be on the record, which must unequivocally show *895 that the waiver was free and voluntary.
  • State of Louisiana v. Dominique J. Casson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Casson 2 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Dardar 977 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Dodson 967 So. 2d 487 La. 2007
    (1971), sets out a "`magic word formula'" which may "`serve as a technical trap for inquiry into the validity of the plea.
  • State v. Warren 968 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Smallwood 955 So. 2d 1264 La. 2007
    (1971), sets out a "`magic word formula'" which may "`serve as a technical trap for conscientious trial judges who conduct a thorough inquiry into the validity of the plea.
  • State v. Estes 956 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    (1971); State v. Monroe, 25,825 (La.App.
  • State v. Ford 957 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Jackson [v. Henderson, , (1971)] rules “is to ensure the defendant’s receipt of adequate information, *314 so that his decision to plead guilty is truly intelligent and voluntary....
  • State v. Jerred 953 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Robinson 943 So. 2d 371 La. 2006
    (1971), adopted as an interim measure until `state and federal jurisprudence solidified,' State ex rel.
  • State v. Mendenhall 944 So. 2d 560 La. 2006
    (1971), sets out a "magic word formula" which may "serve as a technical trap for conscientious trial judges who conduct a thorough inquiry into the validity of the plea.