Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bailey, 261 So. 2d 583.
-
State v. Jupiter
934 So. 2d 884
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Similarly, , -586 (1972), defendant filed a Motion for New Trial contending that a juror gave a false answer during voir dire when he said that he had never been a member of a law enforcement agency.
-
Jenkins v. Baldwin
801 So. 2d 485
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In requesting all favorable or exculpatory material, the defendant relies on the United States Supreme Court's decision, Brady v. State, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct.
- State v. Brown 640 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
- State v. Dozier 553 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
-
State v. Ruff
504 So. 2d 72
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
14:20, Reporter's Comment (1); , (1972).
- State v. Larsen 489 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- State v. Williams 461 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
- State v. Stevenson 447 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
State v. Brown
414 So. 2d 726
La. 1982
State v. Collins, supra; , (1972); Reporter's Comment, Subdivision (1) to R.S.
- State v. Simmons 390 So. 2d 1317 La. 1980
- State v. Atkins 360 So. 2d 1341 La. 1978
- State v. Hopkins 351 So. 2d 474 La. 1977
-
State v. Alexander
334 So. 2d 388
La. 1976
(1972); State v. Pratt, 255 La.
-
State v. Babin
319 So. 2d 367
La. 1975
See, e. g., , (1972); State v. Hunter, 250 La.
-
State v. Guinn
319 So. 2d 407
La. 1975
(1972), we held: "The purpose of charging the jury is to inform them of the law and, at the same time, give both the defendant and the State an appraisal of the law that is fair.
- State v. Nero 319 So. 2d 303 La. 1975
- State v. Nelson 306 So. 2d 745 La. 1975
-
State v. Collins
306 So. 2d 662
La. 1975
(1972); State v. Rowland, 246 La.
- State v. Breston 304 So. 2d 313 La. 1974
-
State v. Vince
305 So. 2d 916
La. 1974
(1972); State v. Pratt, 255 La.
- State v. Cordier 297 So. 2d 181 La. 1974
-
State v. Patterson
295 So. 2d 792
La. 1974
(1972); State v. Rowland, 246 La.
-
State v. Thomas
290 So. 2d 317
La. 1974
(1972); State v. Gladden, 260 La.
-
State v. Gray
286 So. 2d 644
La. 1973
(1972); State v. Gladden, 260 La.
-
State v. Baker
288 So. 2d 52
La. 1973
(1972), the accused sought in his motion for bill of particulars all evidence, known then or later to the State, which was exculpatory in nature or favorable to the accused.
- State v. Linkletter 286 So. 2d 321 La. 1973
-
State v. Womack
283 So. 2d 708
La. 1973
State v. Barksdale, supra; , (1972); State v. Pratt, 255 La.
- State v. Edgecombe 275 So. 2d 740 La. 1973
-
State v. Brevelle
270 So. 2d 852
La. 1972
(1972); State v. Hunter, 250 La.
- State v. Refuge 270 So. 2d 842 La. 1972