DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Media Production Consultants, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc., 262 So. 2d 377.

120 citing documents.

  • LeBlanc v. Ellerbee Builders, Inc. 317 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    Nevertheless, the plaintiffs argue that they should recover under Louisiana's so-called Consumer Protection Rule as set forth in Media Production Consultants, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc., , (1972).
  • Womack & Adcock v. 3M Business Products Sales, Inc. 316 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    Consult., Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of N. A., Inc., , (1972), noted in 33 La.L.Rev.
  • Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc. 315 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    Media Production Consultants v. Mercedes-Benz of N. A., Inc., , (1972).
  • Overruled Peltier v. Seabird Industries, Inc. 309 So. 2d 343 La. 1975
    221 , (1956); Media Production Consultants, , (1972)
  • Wade v. McInnis-Peterson Chevrolet, Inc. 307 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    Consult., Inc., v. Mercedes-Benz of N.A., Inc., , (1972).
  • Ticheli v. Silmon 304 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
    Media Production Consultants, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc., , (1972).
  • Hob's Refrigeration & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Poche 304 So. 2d 326 La. 1974
    See also Media Production Consultants, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc., , (1972).
  • Stelly v. Gerber Products Company 299 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    Consult., Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of N.A., Inc., 1972, , .
  • Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc. 302 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    Inc. v. Mercedes Benz of N. A., Inc., , (1972)
  • Dunlap v. Chrysler Motors Corp. 299 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    Consultation, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of N.A., Inc., , (1972).
  • State Ex Rel. Guste v. Simoni, Heck and Associates 297 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    As authority to bring this action against Airtrol and York in the absence of privity of contract, plaintiffs rely on the case of Media Production Consultants, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc., , (1972).
  • Rey v. Cuccia 298 So. 2d 840 La. 1974
    Civil Code Articles 2475, 2476, 2520; Media Production Consultants, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc., , (1972).
  • Anderson v. Bohn Ford, Inc. 294 So. 2d 829 La. 1974
  • Anderson v. Bohn Ford, Inc. 291 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    Consult., Inc. v. Mercedez-Benz of N.A., Inc., supra, , .
  • Hoffman v. All Star Insurance Corp. 288 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    Consult, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of N.A., Inc., , , it was held that the purchaser of a defective automobile has a cause of action for the full purchase price against the distributor and manufacturer and is not relegated to an action against his immediate vendor, the dealer.
  • Clark v. McBride Dodge, Inc. 289 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    Consult., Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of N. A., Inc., , (1972), the Supreme Court said: "Two warranty obligations are inherent in every sale, the warranty of merchantable title and the warranty of reasonable fitness for the product's intended use.
  • Baughman v. Quality Mobile Homes, Inc. 289 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    In the recent case of Media Production Consultants, Inc., v. Mercedes-Benz of North Amercia, Inc., et al., , (1972), with regard to the obligation of the seller, the Court said: "Two warranty obligations are inherent in every sale, the warranty of merchantable title and the warranty of reasonable fitness for the product's intended use.
  • Breaux v. Winnebago Industries, Inc. 282 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    [15] In the very recent case of Media Production Consultants, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc., , , on remand, (4th Cir. 1972), the Supreme Court held Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. which it classified as the manufacturer, solidarily liable with the retailer, Cookie's Auto Sales, Inc., for price of an automobile and other allowable expenses because of redhibitory vices and defec
  • Prince v. Paretti Pontiac Company, Inc. 281 So. 2d 112 La. 1973
    Consult., Inc. v. Mercedez-Benz of N.A., Inc., , (1972); Reech v. Coco, 223 La.
  • Media Production Consultants, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. 264 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972