Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Clouatre, 264 So. 2d 595.

30 citing documents.

State v. Lockett 754 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
On February 23, 1998, the trial court granted the state's Prieur motion, , (1972), State v. Smith, 257 La.
State v. Walker 489 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Brown 479 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
1976); , (1972); State v. Williams, 260 La.
State v. Russell 434 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. May 362 So. 2d 516 La. 1978
State v. Drew 360 So. 2d 500 La. 1978
State v. Hutto, supra ; , (1972).
State v. Sheppard 350 So. 2d 615 La. 1977
State v. Hutto 349 So. 2d 318 La. 1977
State v. Anderson 343 So. 2d 135 La. 1977
State v. Perique 340 So. 2d 1369 La. 1976
(1972); State v. Williams, 260 La.
State v. Williams 341 So. 2d 370 La. 1976
15:275; , (1972); see 21 Loyola L.Rev.
State v. Overton 337 So. 2d 1058 La. 1976
State v. Strange 334 So. 2d 182 La. 1976
See State v. Thorson, La., (1974); , (1972); State v. Richard, 256 La.
State v. Mayes 332 So. 2d 212 La. 1976
State v. Governor 331 So. 2d 443 La. 1976
State v. Smith 327 So. 2d 355 La. 1976
State v. Nicholas 312 So. 2d 856 La. 1975
State v. Gaspard 301 So. 2d 344 La. 1974
1973); , 264 * (1972); State v. Kreller, 255 La.
State v. Bradford 298 So. 2d 781 La. 1974
State v. Whitley 296 So. 2d 820 La. 1974
State v. Sylvester 298 So. 2d 807 La. 1974
State v. Kenner 290 So. 2d 299 La. 1974
State v. Brown 288 So. 2d 339 La. 1974
(1972), where the statement "it's down" by the defendant as he swallowed heroin in a struggle with officers was held so admissible.
State v. Goldberg 284 So. 2d 926 La. 1973
State v. Howard 283 So. 2d 197 La. 1973
1012 , (1972); , (1972); State v. Sinclair, 258 La.
State v. Lee 281 So. 2d 123 La. 1973
(1972) we held: "During voir dire examination the prosecutor read Section 962 of Title 40 of the Revised Statutes, the statute defining the crime of which he is charged, in order to ascertain from the prospective jurors whether they entertained objections to enforcing the law governing the possession o
State v. Richmond 278 So. 2d 17 La. 1973
Recently, , (1972), this Court explained: "Inculpatory statements which are voluntary and part of the action at the time the crime is being committed are in no sense to be governed by the rules applicable to confessions or inculpatory statements set forth in Article 768 of the Code of Criminal Procedure."
State v. Prieur 277 So. 2d 126 La. 1973
197 , (1972); , (1972); State v. Hayes, 262 La.
State v. Jordan 276 So. 2d 277 La. 1973
State v. Edgecombe 275 So. 2d 740 La. 1973