DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tannehill v. Tannehill, 261 So. 2d 619.

25 citing documents.

  • Succession of Mary Grace Green Burley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    74, (1971), affirmed, So.2d 619 (1972).
  • Karen Cohen Kinnett Versus Jarred Brandon Kinnett La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
    However, the need to protect innocent children from those consequences, combined with the difficulty of proving paternity, resulted in strict application of the marital presumption.36 See, (La.
  • State of Louisiana, Department of Children and Family Services, in the Interest of A.L. v. Thomas Robert Lowrie 167 So. 3d 573 La. 2015
    art. 185, 2005 Official Revision Comment (b) ( , (1972); Williams v. Williams, 230 La.
  • Miles v. OUR LADY OF THE LAKE REG. MEDICAL 836 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    74 , (1971), affirmed, , (1972).
  • Taylor v. Hixson Autoplex of Alexandria, Inc. 781 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    74 , (1971), affirmed, , (1972).
  • Hall v. Hall 689 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • Whiddon v. Whiddon 676 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Guillory v. GUILLORY EX REL. ARCENEAUX 615 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Smith v. Jones 566 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    (1972), the supreme court acknowledged it had never allowed a disavowal of paternity and held that Mr. Tannehill could not disavow paternity of his wife's child despite the fact that he had been sterile since childhood.
  • Smith v. Cole 553 So. 2d 847 La. 1989
    [discussion of the inequities existing between maternal adulteries and paternal adulteries]; , (1972) [unless the birth of the child has been concealed from the father, disavowal is prohibited when sought because of adultery of the wife, citing LSA-C.C.
  • Maxwell v. Wester 464 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    In reaching this conclusion, , at page 622 (1972), as follows: “The codal provisions prevent the disavowal of paternity except within extremely narrow limits, and then only if done promptly after the birth.
  • Lee v. Lee 437 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    App. 3d Cir.1971), affirmed, , (1972), where it stated: “The alimony pendente lite which was fixed by rule continues until judgment of final divorce unless changed by the.
  • Verneuille v. Verneuille 438 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    [3] , Williams v. Williams, 230 La.
  • Mock v. Mock 411 So. 2d 1063 La. 1982
    art. 185); disavowal for sterility due to a childhood disease was not allowed, the testimony of both the husband and the mother that the couple had not had sexual relations with each other was not sufficient to support the disavowal action, the fact that the mother was living with the child's acknowledged father at the time of the child's conc
  • Tenneco Oil Company v. Houston 372 So. 2d 1194 La. 1979
    See: Civil Code Articles 191, 192 (1870); , (1972); Williams v. Williams, 230 La.
  • Hodges v. Hodges 348 So. 2d 1284 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
  • Succession of Mitchell 323 So. 2d 451 La. 1975
    See: Civil Code Articles 191, 192; So.2d 619 (1972); Williams v. Williams, 230 La.
  • Morrison v. Griffin 323 So. 2d 451 La. 1975
    See: Civil Code Articles 191, 192; , (1972); Williams v. Williams, 230 La.
  • Dugas v. Henson 307 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    In fact, , (1972), our Supreme Court has never allowed a disavowal of paternity.
  • Dugas v. Henson 310 So. 2d 851 La. 1975
    (1972) & opinion in Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co., 261 La.
  • Succession of Goss 304 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    3rd Cir. 1969), affirmed , (1972)].
  • Taylor v. Taylor 295 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    (citations omitted) , (1972) our Supreme Court chose to follow the strict interpretation of these Code Articles.
  • Seals v. Jacobs 292 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    see also Walker v. Jarnevich, La.App., wherein the Court said: "In the instant case it is conclusively shown that Levi Walker was entirely familiar with the fact that this plaintiff was pregnant at the time of their marriage and that the child was born some sixty days following the cele
  • Brugman v. Prejean 288 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    (1972); Williams v. Williams, 230 La.
  • Enterkin v. Devaux 272 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973