Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Williams v. Hudson East, 261 So. 2d 629.

20 citing documents.

  • Davis v. United General Insurance Co. 654 So. 2d 317 La. 1995
    Co. of North America, , (1972).
  • Morgan v. General Motors Corp. 459 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    “Proof of disability arising by reason of subjective pain must of necessity depend to a great extent upon the trial court’s evaluation of the truthfulness of the claimant’s complaints in the light of the entire record of medical and lay testimony.”
  • Dauzat v. Gregory & Cook, Inc. 454 So. 2d 807 La. 1984
  • Guerrero v. Tico 436 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    Crump, ; -597 (La.1977); -749 (La.1975)
  • Pendleton v. Spartan Bldg. Const. 432 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    Lucas v. Insurance Company of North America, *301 -597 (La.1977); Tantillo, -748
  • Andrews v. Pine Hill Wood Co. 426 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • Henson v. Handee Corp. 421 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
    Augustine, supra; , (1972).
  • Booker v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc. 389 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    (1972); Reed v. Calcasieu Paper Co., 233 La.
  • Crump v. Hartford Acc. and Indem. Co. 367 So. 2d 300 La. 1979
    Lucas v. Insurance *303 Company of North America, , (1972).
  • Crawford v. Al Smith P. & H. Service, Inc. 352 So. 2d 669 La. 1977
    (1972); Lawless v. Steel Erectors, Inc., 254 La.
  • Lucas v. Ins. Co. of North America 342 So. 2d 591 La. 1977
  • Martinez v. Equitable Equipment Co. 330 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    *637 (1972), the Court, speaking through Justice Tate, held: “A medical witness may possess a peculiar competence to testify on questions of medical causation and of possible relation of symptoms to the medical injury..
  • Roberson v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 316 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    (1972); Odom v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, Clement v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
  • Dupard v. M & C CONSTRUCTION CO. 312 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    (1972); Reed v. Calcasieu Paper Company, 233 La.
  • Distinguished Toomer v. Highlands Insurance Co. 295 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    (1972), which are readily distinguishable from the instant case because the plaintiffs in each of the cited cases proved that their disability was accident related.
  • Johnson v. Cajun Enterprises 293 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    The Supreme Court reversed, holding for the plaintiff, , (1972) case: "Proof of disability arising by reason of subjective pain must of necessity depend to a great extent upon the trial court's evaluation of the truthfulness of the claimant's complaints in the light of the entire record of medical and lay testimony.
  • Arthur v. McConnell 286 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
    (1972) the court accepted lay testimony in preference to medical evidence relative to whether an employee had proved residual pain resulting from an on-the-job accident.
  • Johnson v. Travelers Insurance Co. 284 So. 2d 888 La. 1973
    However, , (1972), the following general considerations apply: "A medical witness may possess a peculiar competence to testify on questions of medical causation and of possible relation of symptoms to the medical injury.
  • Semien v. Haas-Hirsch Estate 281 So. 2d 758 La. 1973
  • Kennedy v. Calcasieu Paper Co. 262 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    Recently in Williams v. Hudson East, La., (1972), our Supreme Court awarded compensation based on total and permanent disability to a man whose “.