DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Howard, 263 So. 2d 32.

61 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana v. Jeremy James Griner La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    P. art. 875A( 1); 263 So.
  • State v. Monroe 198 So. 3d 259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    at p. 5, 779 So.2d at 701 ( (on rehearing); , (1972)).
  • State v. Smith 186 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    State v. Mitchell, supra; *710 , (1972).
  • State v. Simms 143 So. 3d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    at p. 5, 779 So.2d at 701 ( (on rehearing); , (1972)).
  • State v. Toups 144 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    art 875(A)(1); , (1972).
  • State v. Jackson 130 So. 3d 993 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Harris 105 So. 3d 914 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Darrell W. Westmoreland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    State v. Lloyd, 42,793 (La.App.
  • State v. Westmoreland 63 So. 3d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    (1972); State v. Lloyd, 42,793 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Paxton Jules Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    (on rehearing); So.2d 32 (1972).
  • State v. Trahan 61 So. 3d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    (on rehearing); *800 576 (La.1973); , (1972).
  • State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    (on rehearing); So.2d 32 (1972).
  • State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    (on rehearing); , (1972).
  • State v. Thomas 36 So. 3d 1178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Mitchell, supra; , (1972).
  • State of Louisiana v. Kendall Paul Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    (on rehearing); So.2d 32 (1972).
  • State v. Davis 36 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    (on rehearing); , (1972).
  • State v. Lloyd 973 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Deterrence is a legitimate sentencing object, , (1972), even though a defendant has demonstrated efforts to reform.
  • State v. Dagenhart 908 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Deterrence is a legitimate sentencing object, , (1972), even though a defendant has demonstrated efforts to reform.
  • State v. Small 850 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    (on rehearing); , (1972).
  • State v. White 850 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    (on rehearing); , (1972).
  • State v. Edison 847 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    (1972); State v. Green, 34,676 (La.App.
  • State v. Shed 828 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Mitchell, supra; , (1972).
  • State v. Shed 828 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Mitchell, supra ; , (1972).
  • State v. Wright 796 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    (on rehearing); , (1972).
  • State v. Green 787 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    In sentencing, deterrence is a legitimate sentencing object, , (1972), even though a defendant has demonstrated efforts to reform.
  • State v. Mitchell 779 So. 2d 698 La. 2001
    (on rehearing); , (1972).
  • State v. Rubin 588 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Chairs 493 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    art. 774, which in pertinent part, reads: “The argument shall be confined to evidence admitted, to the lack of evidence, to conclusions of fact that the state or defendant may draw therefrom, and to the law applicable to the case.” and many other cases wherein the Supreme Court discussed at length the impropriety of unfavorable direct or indirect references to a defendant’s Fifth Amendment right to silence.
  • State v. Priestley 478 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Davis 471 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    1973); , (1972) (footnote omitted).
  • State v. Dixon 471 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Sprinkle 439 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    Further, noted by footnote: An older line of cases, , [both cited as authority in the state brief] suggested that only direct references to the accused's failure to take the stand constituted grounds for reversal on appeal.
  • State v. Tully 430 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    (1972); State v. Jackson .
  • State v. Johnson 426 So. 2d 95 La. 1983
  • State v. Harvill 403 So. 2d 706 La. 1981
    [3] An older line of cases, , suggested that only direct references to the accused's failure to take the stand constituted grounds for reversal on appeal.
  • State v. Bell 377 So. 2d 275 La. 1979
    Howard v. Maggio, 540 F.2d 1280 (5th Cir. 1976); , (1972).
  • State v. Murray 375 So. 2d 80 La. 1979
    *87 (La.1977); (on rehearing); , (1972).
  • State v. Perkins 374 So. 2d 1234 La. 1979
    (on rehearing); , (1972).
  • State Ex Rel. Clark v. Marullo 352 So. 2d 223 La. 1977
  • State v. Frank 344 So. 2d 1039 La. 1977
    State v. Reed, La., (1973); , (1972); State v. Bentley, 219 La.
  • State v. Johnson 345 So. 2d 14 La. 1977
    (1972), and take the position that to constitute reversible error the comment must be direct and the inference plain that the remark was intended to bring the jury's attention to the failure of the defendant to testify.
  • State v. Williams 341 So. 2d 370 La. 1976
    (1972), and the cases cited therein.
  • State v. Smith 336 So. 2d 867 La. 1976
    Cf.: State v. Reed, La., (1973); , (1972); State v. Antoine, 189 La.
  • State v. Victorian 332 So. 2d 220 La. 1976
  • State v. McClinton 329 So. 2d 676 La. 1976
    (decided January 19, 1976); , (1972).
  • State v. Smith 327 So. 2d 355 La. 1976
    (1972) and State v. Clouatre, 262 La.
  • State v. Stewart 325 So. 2d 828 La. 1976
    (decided November 4, 1975); , (1972).
  • State v. Bryant 325 So. 2d 255 La. 1976
  • State v. Pierce 321 So. 2d 523 La. 1975
    (1972), the defendant was sentenced to 99 years at hard labor for armed robbery without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence.
  • State v. Brown 322 So. 2d 211 La. 1975
    (1972): "There is no constitutional infirmity in such penalty provision for the crime of armed robbery.