Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co., 262 So. 2d 328.
-
Duhon v. Saloom
325 So. 2d 794
La. 1976
DIXON, J., , and the factual issue on the *795 plea of prescription should have been submitted to the jury.
-
Duhon v. Saloom
325 So. 2d 794
La. 1976
DIXON, J., , and the factual issue on the *795 plea of prescription should have been submitted to the jury.
-
Duhon v. Saloom
323 So. 2d 202
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
(1972) an exception of no right of action (which is completely equivalent to one of prescription for the procedural question now at hand) had been filed apparently after answer to the original petition but before any answer to an amended and supplemental petition.
-
Succession of Mitchell
323 So. 2d 451
La. 1975
We granted certiorari, (1975), to consider the correctness of the cited intermediate decisions in George and Barlow , as well as because, under the facts shown, , (1972).
-
Morrison v. Griffin
323 So. 2d 451
La. 1975
We granted certiorari, (1975), to consider the correctness of the cited intermediate decisions in George and Barlow, as well as because, under the facts shown, , (1972).
- West v. STATE, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUB. EDUC. 324 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
-
Dugas v. Henson
307 So. 2d 650
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Art. 198, and the Supreme Court holding in Babineaux v. PernieBailey Drilling Co., , (1972).
-
Dugas v. Henson
310 So. 2d 851
La. 1975
933 , (1972) & , (1972).
-
Orleans Parish School Board v. Williams
300 So. 2d 848
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
art. 927(5), serves to defeat only a petition by the wrong plaintiff, Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Dr. Co., 1972, , .
- State Ex Rel. Guste v. Simoni, Heck and Associates 297 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
- Warren v. Richard 296 So. 2d 813 La. 1974
- Bussie v. Long 286 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
-
Warren v. Richard
283 So. 2d 507
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
1st Cir. 1971), [ ] (1974), the First Circuit took a similar position in a reverse situation in holding that an adulterous bastard cannot recover for the wrongful death of his biological father.
-
Potter v. Brein
289 So. 2d 309
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
(1972), contains an excellent discussion of the purposes of the exception of no cause and of no right of action and states the law applicable to the instant case: “There has been much discussion about the purpose of the exception of no right of action, and many attempts to differentiate that exception
- Duhon v. Lafayette General Hospital 286 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973