Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hall, 260 So. 2d 913.

19 citing documents.

State v. Daniels 740 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
(1972), the supreme court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting a photo lineup, which consisted only of "mug shots," because they were "relevant as a predicate to show the fairness of the identification process."
State v. Johnson 598 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Gordon 504 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Chairs 493 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Regarding any possible prejudicial effect on the jurors
State v. Sanders 357 So. 2d 1089 La. 1978
State v. Sutfield 354 So. 2d 1334 La. 1978
State v. Gilmore 332 So. 2d 256 La. 1976
State v. Williams 310 So. 2d 528 La. 1975
(1972); State v. Pierre, 261 La.
State v. Lewis 296 So. 2d 824 La. 1974
1080 , (1972); , (1972); State v. Jones, 261 La.
State v. Pierre 284 So. 2d 886 La. 1973
914 , (1972); , (1972); State v. Amphy, 259 La.
State v. Jefferson 284 So. 2d 577 La. 1973
(1972), and State v. Pierre, 261 La.
State v. Moseley 284 So. 2d 749 La. 1973
(1972); State v. Pierre, 261 La.
State v. Jones 283 So. 2d 476 La. 1973
(1972); State v. Harris, 258 La.
State v. Newman 283 So. 2d 756 La. 1973
(1972); State v. Pierre, 261 La.
State v. Douglas 278 So. 2d 485 La. 1973
983, 998 , (1972); , (1972); State v. Burch, 261 La.
State v. Pope 273 So. 2d 272 La. 1973
3 , (1972) (possession of narcotics); , (1972) (armed robbery); State v. Higginbotham, 261 La.
State v. Dudek 268 So. 2d 217 La. 1972
State v. Curry 264 So. 2d 583 La. 1972
State v. Valentine 263 So. 2d 893 La. 1972
15:441 et seq.; , (decided April 13, 1972).