Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Howard v. Hardware Mutual Company, 286 So. 2d 334.

15 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana and the Vermilion Parish School Board v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Prcp-Ns New Orleans, LLC D/B/A Esplanade at City Park v. Anne Swanson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Williams v. Hosp. Serv. Dist. No.1 of Tangipahoa Parish 258 So. 3d 584 La. 2018
1977), ; ; Louisiana Power and Light Company v. Lasseigne, 255 La.
Fraternal Order of Police v. New Orleans 831 So. 2d 897 La. 2002
1977); Louisiana Power and Light Company v. Lasseigne, 255 La.
Shell Pipeline Corp. v. Kennedy 799 So. 2d 475 La. 2001
Louisiana Power and Light Company v. Lasseigne, 255 La.
Harris v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 485 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Jeanmard v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. 436 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
US Fire Ins. Co. v. Swann 424 So. 2d 240 La. 1982
Davidge v. Magliola, 346 * Louisiana Power and Light Company v. Lasseigne, 255 La.
Halcomb v. Halcomb 343 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Davidge v. Magliola 346 So. 2d 177 La. 1977
Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Lasseigne, 255 La.
Iles v. White 345 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
SUCCESSION OF NUNEZ EX REL. FIRST NAT. B. OF A. v. Pickett 335 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Washington v. Sabine State Bank & Trust Co. 328 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
(S.Ct.La.1973) the Court of Appeal had dismissed an appeal for failure to pay the appellate court’s filing fee based on an affidavit by the lower court clerk that appellant had not paid such fee.
Howard v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. 294 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
The Supreme Court of Louisiana, at La., upheld the decision of the Lower Court which had found that plaintiff and her counsel were not at fault for failure to pay the $25.00 filing fee, and the dismissal of plaintiff’s appeal was reversed and the case remanded to this Court for plaintiff’s appeal which is now before us. The Lower Court awarded plaintiff ind