Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Barrois v. Service Drayage Co., 253 So. 2d 66.

21 citing documents.

Katty Calderon, Natural Mother of the Decedent, Avril Sanabria Versus Lezly Sanabria, Suly Sanabria, Jonathan Rivera, Abc Insurance … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
App. 4 Cir.), writ denied, (La.
Wilson v. US Fire and Cas. Co. 593 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Civello v. Johnson 567 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
805 , 806, Marzula v. White, supra ; Nichols Construction Corporation v. Spell, supra .
Abbott v. Claiborne Parish School Bd. 550 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
4th Cir.1971), writ denied, Cleveland v. TheriotModec Enterprises, Inc., (La.App.
Miller v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 484 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Cleveland v. Theriot-Modec Enterprises, Inc. 469 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Derouselle v. Konecny 468 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Washington v. Buffalo Mills Lumber Co., Inc. 451 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Pennington v. Reading & Bates Construction Co. 432 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
807 , (1971); Hemphill v. Tremont Lumber Co., 209 La.
Rumore v. Smith 430 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
4th Cir.1971, writ denied , 259 La.
Guidry v. Sline Indus. Painters, Inc. 418 So. 2d 626 La. 1982
807 , (1971); Hemphill v. Tremont Lumber Co., 209 La.
Buckley v. Exxon Corp. 399 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Sanders Drilling & Workover Co. 396 So. 2d 1353 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
4th Cir. 1971), application denied
Lay v. Allied Chemical Corp. 340 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Nichols Const. Corp. v. Spell 315 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
805 , 806, ; Benoit v. Hunt Oil Company, 219 La.
Johnson v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company 303 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
York v. Sedotal 281 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
805 , (1971), this court used such a projection to assist it in arriving at a figure and noted the finder of fact was not bound by the computation.
Felder v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 286 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Smith v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. 269 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
807 , (1971), it was held: “All that claimant is legally required to establish is that the decedent’s customary and usual duties of employment directly contributed to the employee’s demise, it being unnecessary that the injury be the result of unusual physical effort, or that it is the exclusive cause of the disability or d
Aubert v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. 269 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Bringol 262 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
805 , (1971); Garvey v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.