Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Laird v. Travelers Insurance Company, 267 So. 2d 714.

82 citing documents.

J. Caldarera & Co., Inc. Versus Tracie J. Stigler, Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC and Specialized Loan Servicing … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
Synikia Hester Individually And On Behalf Of Kunta La. 2021
6 (1972) ; Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Co ., 242 La.
Guilbeau v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 269 So. 3d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Co. , , , 718 (1972) determined that La.R.S.
Keith Antoine v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Co., determined that La.R.S.
Ogea v. Merritt 130 So. 3d 888 La. 2013
Martin v. State, Department of Public Safety & Corrections, Office of State Police 109 So. 3d 442 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Derek Page v. H. Cookie Benson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Co., So.2d 714, 717 (1972)).
Page v. Benson 101 So. 3d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
S.J. v. Lafayette Parish School Board 41 So. 3d 1119 La. 2010
S. J. v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LeRouge 995 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
1973); , (1972); Lee v. Louisiana Transit Company, Inc., (La.App.
Hamilton v. City of Shreveport 896 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Chevalier v. LH Bossier, Inc. 676 So. 2d 1072 La. 1996
Co., , (1972) ( quoting Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Company, 257 La.
Wood v. May 647 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
As stated by the trial court, , (1972) does, indeed, say that: "`Criminal statutes are not, in and of themselves, definitive of civil liability' and do not set the rule for civil liability ..."
Slaton v. Stein 640 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
our Louisiana Supreme Court noted the highly fact-intensive nature of the duty-risk analysis: |4“ , (1972), another traffic accident case, we found foreseeability to be a more appropriate test when only a single actor is involved.
Gugliuzza v. KCMC, INC. 606 So. 2d 790 La. 1992
Roberts v. Benoit 605 So. 2d 1032 La. 1992
(1972), another traffic accident case, we found foreseeability to be a more appropriate test when only a single actor is involved.
Murphy v. KD Auger Trucking, Inc. 598 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Jaggers v. Free State Tool Corp. 571 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Miller v. Fields 570 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Spencer v. Magee 563 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., supra ; , (1972).
Mang v. Palmer 557 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., supra ; , (1972).
Kounter v. Carleton 510 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
In his explanation of the charge, pages 61-62, Johnson states he attempts to convey the current position of the Supreme Court of Louisiana that violation of a penal statute, such as one for highway regulations, is not “negligence per se.” , (1972)
Sparacello v. Andrews 501 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Ducote v. Voorhies (3rd Cir., 1977) Follins v. Barrow (1st Cir., 1977) Herbert v. Maryland Casualty Company (1st Cir., 1978) Laird v. Travelers Insurance Company , (1972) Brown v. Louisiana Department of Highways (3rd Cir., 1979) LeJeune v. Allstate Insurance Company DEFENDANTS' REQUESTED JURY CHARGES NO. 2 In determining whether or not Roy C. Jensen, III's conduct was a cause in fact of the death of Salvatore (Sam) John Spar
Snyder v. Bergeron 501 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Laird v. Travelers *295 Insurance Co., , d 714 (1972); (La.App.
Lucey v. Harris 490 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Lavergne v. Thomas 491 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Meaux v. Ideal Mutual Insurance Co. 479 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
While duty-risk has been said to express “more clearly, simply, and logically the rationale of the result,” , when the result is the same under either method, we cannot say the trial court erred in using the language of proximate cause.
Ward v. La. & Ark. Ry. Co. 451 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
471 , (1962); , (1972); is applicable for the purpose of determining the appellant's liability to the plaintiffs as a result of their violation of the Bossier City speed ordinance and the railroad's own speed limitation contained in its special instructions.
Duplechain v. Turner 444 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Ketcher v. Illinois Central Gulf R. Co. 440 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Wright v. O'NEAL 427 So. 2d 852 La. 1983
Allen v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 423 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, supra ; , (1972); Charpentier v. St.
Merrick v. Wheeler 419 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Wright v. O'Neal 414 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
whether (the violation) was a substantial factor without which the accident would not have occurred — that is, whether it had some direct relationship to the accident.” , (1972).
Charpentier v. St. Martin Parish School Bd. 411 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Head v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 408 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Knockum v. Amoco Oil Company 402 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
542 , (1972); , (1972); and LeJeune v. Allstate Ins.
Lambert v. Maryland Cas. Co. 403 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Pierrotti v. Associated Indem. Corp. 399 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
542 , (1972); , (1972); Hebert v. Maryland Cas.
Palmer v. State 393 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Ganey v. Beatty 391 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Lawes v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 387 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Solis v. Civic Ctr. Site Development Co., Inc. 385 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Craig v. Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Co. 377 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
(1972) which involved a daytime accident.
Broyles v. Yarbrough 374 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, , (1972); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.
Reinhard v. City of New Orleans 371 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Kane v. Braquet 368 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
542 , (1972); , (1972); "
Burns v. Salisbury 367 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Cheatham v. City of New Orleans 368 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
(1972), every act leading up to an event which is the subject matter of litigation cannot be said to be a cause-in-faet.