DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Major v. Hall, 263 So. 2d 22.

16 citing documents.

  • Polk v. Buckhalter 258 So. 3d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    In Major v. Hall , , 248-49, , 24 (La.
  • Kingfish Development, LLC v. Press It 1 New Orleans, LLC 135 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    (1972), the Louisiana Supreme Court held: “Damages are not recoverable on a rule to show cause.
  • Abdallah v. Uptown Dante Supermarket, Inc. 137 So. 3d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    |Jn Major v. Hall, the Supreme Court stated: “[t]he law of this state is clear to the effect that damages, in the absence of a special provision, may only be recovered in an ordinary proceeding.”
  • Phoenix Associates v. EH Mitchell & Co. 970 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    1 Cir.1971), partially reversed on other grounds, , (1972).
  • In re the Tutorship of Matthews 543 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    art. 3066, , (1972), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that in the absence of a special statutory provision, damages are not recoverable in a summary proceeding, we find that a forfeiture of a surety bond is not a granting of damages.
  • Bowling U.S.A., Inc. v. Genco 536 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    1st Cir.1971), reversed on other grounds
  • Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Wilson 503 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    *566 , the Supreme Court stated: “The Court of Appeal correctly refused to allow damages but for the wrong reason.
  • Thompson v. Avenue of Americas Corp. 499 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    1st Cir.1971), partially reversed on other grounds, , (1972).
  • Adam, Inc. v. Dividend, Inc. 447 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    (partially reversed on other grounds, , (1972).
  • Devillier v. Devillier 439 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Friedman v. Hofchar, Inc. 424 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
    This was a summary proceeding, and the Supreme Court of Louisiana has said, , (1972), that money damages are not recoverable in summary proceedings on a rule to show cause.
  • Mitchell v. V-6 Co. 372 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    App. 1st Cir. 1971), partially reversed on other grounds , (1972); Landis v. Smith, 22. (La.
  • Himbola Manor Apartments v. Allen 315 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
  • Hall v. Major 312 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
  • West End Landing, Inc. v. Board of Levee Com'rs 299 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    1st Cir. 1971) partially reversed on other grounds, , (1972), the court stated as follows: "The Louisiana jurisprudence is clear and well established that a lessor's acceptance of rental payments after the notice of default and the grace period constitutes a waiver of the breach and notification thereof.
  • Major v. Hall 286 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973