Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ascension Builders, Inc. v. Jumonville, 263 So. 2d 875.

91 citing documents.

Springwood Homeowner's Association, Inc. v. Michelle Gutherie-Brown La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
In setting aside a default judgment entered by a lower court, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “a right is nothing without proof of the juridical act or material fact which it has as its origin.” Arias, 08-1111, p. 10, 9 So.3d at 822 (quoting Ascension Builders, (1972)).
Billy E. Loftin, Jr. & Phyllis Loftin v. Haylie Royer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
“There is a presumption that a default judgment is supported by sufficient evidence, but this presumption does not attach when the record upon which the judgment is rendered indicates otherwise.” Ascension Builders, So.2d 875, 878 (1972); see also Massey v. Consumer’s Ice Co. of Shreveport, 223 La.
Brittany Cavet v. Abc Insurance Company and Maison St. Charles, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Ascension Builders, (1972).
Gypsum Subfloors, Inc. v. Ddg Construction, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Ascension Builders, (1972).
Drs. James and Amy Mautner Versus John Stone Ware, IV and Julia McClendon Ware; Keypoint Home Inspections, L.L.C. … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
App. 5 Cir. 12/30/03), 3 In Ascension Builders, -89 (La.
Taylor v. Taylor 227 So. 3d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/5/09), (citing Ascension Builders, , (1972)).
Romious v. CBSL Transportation Services, Inc. 142 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Ascension Builders, , (1972).
River Parish Contractors, Inc. v. Savoie 101 So. 3d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Ascension Builders, , (1972).
State ex rel. Department of Child & Family Services v. Dennis 90 So. 3d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“In order to obtain a reversal of a default judgment appealed from, or to obtain a remand, defendant must overcome the presumption that the judgment was rendered upon sufficient evidence and that it is correct.” Ascension Builders, , 262 La.
McIntyre v. Sussman 76 So. 3d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“‘[A] plaintiff who knows of a writing which is the principal basis for his claims must produce it when it is the best evidence of the facts at issue.’ ” Id., quoting Ascension Builders, , (1972).
Cynthia Bridges, SEC. Dept. of Rev., State of Louisiana v. Ronald G. Lyles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Ascension Builders, So.2d 875 (1972).
W.L. Wagner & Nina Wagner v. Stephen R. Alford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Ascension Builders, (1972).
Wagner v. Alford 34 So. 3d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Punctual Abstract Co. v. U.S. Land Title 28 So. 3d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Sessions & , 1258 *465 (La.1993); Ascension Builders, , (1972).
Goldfinch v. United Cabs, Inc. 13 So. 3d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Ascension Builders, , (1972)....
Arias v. Stolthaven New Orleans, L.L.C. 9 So. 3d 815 La. 2009
Ascension Builders, , (1972).
Bear Industries, Inc. v. Nature Matters, LLC 994 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Ascension Builders, , (1972).
Arias v. Stolthaven New Orleans, LLC 980 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
The Supreme Court explained in the much cited and followed case of Ascension Builders, , (1972), that where a default is based upon a claim arising out of a written document (such as the American insurance policy in the instant case), the document itself is a necessary element of proof in establishing a prima facie case.
MATRIX CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. Patel 973 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Ascension Builders, -27 , (1972).
Nelson v. Merrick 970 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Ascension Builders, , (1972).
Mitchell v. Bradford 961 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Grevemberg v. GPA FORECASTING GROUP 959 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Grevemberg v. G.P.A. Strategic Forecasting Group, Inc. 959 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Jerry M. Guillory, II v. Stafford Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
In Ascension Builders, -30, -79 (1972) (citations omitted), the supreme court held, “Thus a plaintiff who knows of a writing which is the principal basis for his claims must produce it when it is the best evidence of the facts at issue.
House of Raeford Farms of La. v. Osei-Tutu 942 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
See Ascension Builders, , (La.
Johnston v. Broussard 940 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Ascension Builders, , (1972); (La.
Z.U. Azhar Clinic v. Rafiq 913 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 6/14/00) , , citing Ascension Builders, , (1972).
Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp. v. Pro Source Roofing, Inc. 907 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Ascension Builders, , (1972); Holland v. Aetna Life & Cas.
Terrel Camel and Dina Camel v. Gregory Harmon and Candace Harmon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
However, in Ascension Builders, -89 (La.1972) (citations omitted) the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that: “[A] plaintiff who knows of a writing which is the principal basis for his claims must produce it when it is the best evidence of the facts at issue.
Camel v. Harmon 896 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
However, in Ascension Builders, , -89 (1972) (citations omitted) the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that: “[A] plaintiff who knows of a writing which is the principal basis for his claims must produce it when it is the best evidence of the facts at issue.
New Orleans Business & Industrial District v. AW24 Corp. 898 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Ascension Builders, , (1972); see also Massey v. Consumer’s Ice Co. of Shreveport, 223 La.
Gresham v. Production Management, Inc. 868 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Ascension Builders, v. Jumonville, , (1972)
Champagne v. Manuel 864 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Ascension Builders, , Baugh, supra, at 646 .
Mossy Motors, Inc. v. Cameras America 851 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
The facts in this case create a striking analogy to those found in Ascension Builders, , 262 La.
Conerly v. Jefferson 820 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
(citing Ascension Builders, , (1972)).
Hayes v. Taylor 812 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Martin v. Sanders 805 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Ascension Builders, , Baugh, supra at p. 2-3 , 715 So.2d at 646 .
Caruso v. McBee 767 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Ascension Builders, , (1972).
Louisiana Pacific Corp. v. Hyatt 758 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Ascension Builders, , (1972); see also Massey v. Consumer’s Ice Co. of Shreveport, 223 La.
Ereunao Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Northern 736 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Ascension Builders, , (1972).
Baugh v. PARISH GOV'T RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY 715 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Ascension Builders, , (1972).
Skrantz v. Smith 685 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Ascension Builders, , (1972); see also Massey v. Consumer’s Ice Co. of Shreveport, 223 La.
Thibodeaux v. C.W. & W. Contractors 685 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Ascension Builders, , (1972); see also Massey v. Consumer’s Ice Co. of Shreveport, 223 La.
David Band v. First Bankcard Center 650 So. 2d 738 La. 1995
(1972); Griffin v. Pecanland Mall Association, Ltd., -73 (La.App.
Band v. First Bankcard Center 644 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Ascension Builders, , (1972); see also Massey v. Consumer's Ice Co. of Shreveport, 223 La.
Sessions & Fishman v. Liquid Air Corp. 616 So. 2d 1254 La. 1993
Ascension Builders, , (1972); see also Massey v. Consumer's Ice Co. of Shreveport, 223 La.
Leonard v. Stephens 588 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
See Ascension Builders, , (1972); Sudds v. Protective Cas.
Holloway v. Gulf Motors, Inc. 588 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Ascension Builders, , (1972).
American Bankers Ins. Co. v. State 581 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
(1972) (where in the context of confirmation of a default judgment which recited that evidence had been adduced, and defendant was unable to show otherwise, the court held the presumption that a judgment is based upon sufficient evidence was not overcome).
Travis v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 569 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Ascension Builders, , (1972); (La.App.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by