DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Federal Insurance Co. v. Insurance Co. of No. Amer., 263 So. 2d 871.

66 citing documents.

  • Poole v. Winwell, Inc. 381 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    [3] , (1972), the Supreme Court reiterated established guidelines in determining the appropriate prescriptive period in circumstances as are found in the instant case: "It has been recognized by this Court on numerous occasions that when a party has been damaged by the conduct of another arising out of a con
  • State Ex Rel. Guste v. Chemical Applicators of Lafayette, Inc. 379 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    (1972) and the authorities cited therein.
  • Harris v. Bardwell 373 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
    *784 (1972), majority and concurring opinions.
  • Franklin v. BRIDGES LOAN & INVESTMENT CO., INC. 371 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
    Co. of North America, , (1972); LaFleur v. Brown, 223 La.
  • Henson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 354 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
  • Guillot v. Guillot 346 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • Standard Roofing Co., Inc. v. Ragusa Bros., Inc. 338 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
  • Motorola, Inc. v. Standard Materials, Inc. 337 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    See Federal Insurance Company v. Insurance Company of North America, La., , (1972); McCrory Corporation v. Shepard M. *1216 Latter d/b/a The Commerce Building, (La.App.
  • McCrory Corp. v. Latter 331 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    (1972), stated: "It has been recognized by this Court on numerous occasions that when a party has been damaged by the conduct of another arising out of a contractural [sic] relationship, the former may have two remedies, a suit in contract, or an action in tort, and that he may elect to recover his dam
  • Jackson v. Zito 314 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    use to permit a denial of substantive rights (where the party has timely filed pleadings alleging the factual basis of his claim) because of technical defects of language or of some mechanical `theory-of-the-case' characterization defeating a recovery otherwise allowable under the facts pleaded," (citations omitted), Justice Tate, , (1972).
  • State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Sentry Indem. Co. 316 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    The Supreme Court reversed that decision on other grounds ( , ).
  • Ralston Purina Company v. Cone 304 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
    (1972); Gray & Company, (La.App.
  • Richard v. Smith Engineering Works, Inc. 297 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    We reject Richard’s , (1972).
  • Succession of Killingsworth 292 So. 2d 536 La. 1974
  • Gray & Company, Inc. v. Ranger Insurance Company 292 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    (1972), and cases cited therein.
  • Richardson v. Moore 304 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    as follows: "It has been recognized by this Court on numerous occasions that when a party has been damaged by the conduct of another arising out of a contractural relationship, the former may have two remedies, a suit in contract, or an action in tort."