DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kaufman, 278 So. 2d 86.

20 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Leslie C. Thompson La. 2017
  • State v. Marlowe 81 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    *967 the Louisiana Supreme Court commented on the prohibition against references by the district attorney to race: The purpose of this mandatory prohibition of our 1966 code is to avoid the use of racial prejudice to obtain convictions.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert S. Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    the state asked a witness the following question on re-direct: ‘Do you deny that you told Patricia Butler that there were just two White honkys who got killed, and if it had been two colored people they would have forgotten about it?
  • State v. Willis 915 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Tomlinson 450 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Terracina 430 So. 2d 64 La. 1983
  • State v. Wilson 404 So. 2d 968 La. 1981
  • State v. Bergeron 371 So. 2d 1309 La. 1979
    In State v. Searle we decided, that the broadening of the presumption of theft into a presumption of guilt in a trial for a greater crime, which includes the theft, violates due process by relieving the state of the necessity for producing any evidence of essential elements of the offense (to say nothing of the damage to the presumption
  • State v. McGraw 366 So. 2d 1278 La. 1979
  • State v. Duke 362 So. 2d 559 La. 1978
    See State v. Kaufman, La., (1973).
  • State v. Harvey 358 So. 2d 1224 La. 1978
    147 , (1972), noted by the author of the above-cited article as a "classic illustration of prosecutorial abuse;" No. 60,630
  • State v. Searle 339 So. 2d 1194 La. 1976
  • State v. Jenkins 340 So. 2d 157 La. 1976
    this Court recognized as valid the procedure of deleting references to co-defendants.
  • State v. Kaufman 331 So. 2d 16 La. 1976
  • State v. Carter 326 So. 2d 848 La. 1975
  • State v. Hammler 312 So. 2d 306 La. 1975
  • State v. Kaufman 304 So. 2d 300 La. 1974
  • State v. Dotch 298 So. 2d 742 La. 1974
  • State v. Ackal 290 So. 2d 882 La. 1974
    605 , (1971) and State v. Kaufman, La., (1973).
  • State v. Jones 283 So. 2d 476 La. 1973
    we cited an unbroken line of decisions in support of our statement that: "The purpose of this mandatory prohibition of our 1966 code is to avoid the use of racial prejudice to obtain convictions.