Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Refuge, 270 So. 2d 842.
- State of Louisiana v. Tyler N. Derochowski La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
-
State of Louisiana v. David Lee Leger
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
In an early case decided by the supreme court, (also cited by the Defendant), the trial court allowed testimony as to whether a lie detector test had been given to a witness.
-
State v. Leger
907 So. 2d 739
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
In an early case decided by the supreme court, (La.
-
State v. Logan
822 So. 2d 657
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
art. 921; see also, State v. Harris, 33,406 (La.App.2d Cir.8/25/00), , writ denied, 2000-2868 (La.8/24/01), .
- State v. Evans 734 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
- State v. Semien 566 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- State v. Arnold 533 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- State v. Hocum 456 So. 2d 602 La. 1984
- State v. Davis 407 So. 2d 702 La. 1981
- State v. Edwards 406 So. 2d 1331 La. 1981
- State v. Catanese 368 So. 2d 975 La. 1979
- State v. Titus 358 So. 2d 912 La. 1978
-
State v. Drew
360 So. 2d 500
La. 1978
See, e. g., State v. Franklin, 263 La.
-
State v. Forrest
356 So. 2d 945
La. 1978
The defendant complains that any mention by the state of a failure to take a lie detector test is irremediably prejudicial
-
State v. Vinet
352 So. 2d 684
La. 1977
(1972); McCormick on Evidence, § 207 (2d ed. 1972); Annotation, Physiological or Psychological Truth and Deception Tests, 23 A.L.R.2d 1306 .
-
State v. Whitmore
353 So. 2d 1286
La. 1977
State v. Davis, La., (1977); State v. Governor, La., (1976); State v. Corbin, La., (1973); , (1972); McCormick on Evidence, § 207 (2d ed. 1972); Annotation, Physiological or Psychological Truth and Deception Tests, 23 A.L.R.2d 1306 (1952) and supplement; 22A C.J.S.
-
State v. Davis
351 So. 2d 771
La. 1977
State v. Governor, La., (1976); State v. Corbin, La., (1973); , (1972); McCormick on Evidence, § 207 (2d ed. 1972) Annotation, Physiological or Psychological Truth and Deception Tests, 23 A.L.R.2d 1306 (1952) and supplement; 22A C.J.S.
-
State v. Schouest
351 So. 2d 462
La. 1977
*469 (La.1973); , (1972).
- State v. Weeks 345 So. 2d 26 La. 1977
-
State v. Peters
315 So. 2d 678
La. 1975
1064 , (1973); , (1972); State v. Bradford, 263 La.
-
State v. McMellon
295 So. 2d 782
La. 1974
15:487 and 15:488; , (1972); State v. Knox, 236 La.
-
State v. Sellers
292 So. 2d 222
La. 1974
1945 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1035 (1966)
- State v. Baker 288 So. 2d 52 La. 1973
-
State v. Dickerson
282 So. 2d 456
La. 1973
Recently, , (1972), this Court held that the result of lie detector tests of witnesses was inadmissible in evidence.
-
State v. Frezal
278 So. 2d 64
La. 1973
(1972); State v. Preece, 264 La.