Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Pickett, 259 So. 2d 307.

13 citing documents.

  • State v. Tillery 167 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
    (1972); State v. Martin, 255 La.
  • State v. Green 873 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. LeBlanc 788 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    The Defendant, , further argues that in the least, "a substantial recess should have been ordered to permit appellant and counsel to reevaluate the defense."
  • State v. Johnson 670 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    (1972); State v. Martin, 255 La.
  • State v. Woods 444 So. 2d 1332 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    1747 , 48 L.Ed.2d 207 ; , (1972).
  • State v. LaPorte 436 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Dye 384 So. 2d 420 La. 1980
    820 , 59 L.Ed.2d 25 (1979); , (1972); State v. Martin, 255 La.
  • State v. Drew 360 So. 2d 500 La. 1978
    (1972); State v. Martin, 255 La.
  • State v. McCoy 337 So. 2d 192 La. 1976
    (1972); State v. Martin, 255 La.
  • State v. Hayes 324 So. 2d 421 La. 1975
  • State v. Monk 315 So. 2d 727 La. 1975
  • State v. Nance 315 So. 2d 695 La. 1975
  • State v. Hubbard 279 So. 2d 177 La. 1973
    * * *" The offense of armed robbery, under Article 465 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, may be charged in the following short form: "A. B., while armed with a dangerous weapon, robbed C. D." This Court, , (1972), held that time is not an essential element of the offense of armed robbery.