Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Pickett, 259 So. 2d 307.
-
State v. Tillery
167 So. 3d 15
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
(1972); State v. Martin, 255 La.
- State v. Green 873 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
-
State v. LeBlanc
788 So. 2d 1255
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
The Defendant, , further argues that in the least, "a substantial recess should have been ordered to permit appellant and counsel to reevaluate the defense."
-
State v. Johnson
670 So. 2d 651
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
(1972); State v. Martin, 255 La.
-
State v. Woods
444 So. 2d 1332
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
1747 , 48 L.Ed.2d 207 ; , (1972).
- State v. LaPorte 436 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
State v. Dye
384 So. 2d 420
La. 1980
820 , 59 L.Ed.2d 25 (1979); , (1972); State v. Martin, 255 La.
-
State v. Drew
360 So. 2d 500
La. 1978
(1972); State v. Martin, 255 La.
-
State v. McCoy
337 So. 2d 192
La. 1976
(1972); State v. Martin, 255 La.
- State v. Hayes 324 So. 2d 421 La. 1975
- State v. Monk 315 So. 2d 727 La. 1975
- State v. Nance 315 So. 2d 695 La. 1975
-
State v. Hubbard
279 So. 2d 177
La. 1973
* * *" The offense of armed robbery, under Article 465 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, may be charged in the following short form: "A. B., while armed with a dangerous weapon, robbed C. D." This Court, , (1972), held that time is not an essential element of the offense of armed robbery.