Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ramp v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, 269 So. 2d 239.

74 citing documents.

  • Crawford v. Gray and Associates 493 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, , (1972).
  • Reed v. Verwoerdt 490 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, , (1972).
  • Gifford v. New England Reinsurance Corp. 488 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, , (La.
  • Bellamy v. Janssen 477 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, , (1972).
  • Elzy v. ABC Ins. Co. 472 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • RAYNE STATE BANK & TR. CO. v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co. 469 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, , (1972).
  • Evans v. Detweiler 466 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • Amant v. Talley 454 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, , at 244 (La.1972) sets out, as follows, the duty an attorney owes to his client: An attorney is obligated to exercise at least that degree of care, skill, and diligence which is exercised by prudent practicing attorneys in his locality.
  • Meyers v. Imperial Cas. Indem. Co. 451 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, , (1972).
  • Sturm v. Zelden and Zelden 445 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, , (1972); (La.
  • Cherokee Restaurant, Inc. v. Pierson 428 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, , (1972); (La.App.
  • Davis v. United Parcel Service, Inc. 427 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, , (1972), the court stated as follows: "An attorney is obligated to exercise at least that degree of care, skill, and diligence which is exercised by prudent practicing attorneys in his locality.
  • Caridas v. Cabral 427 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Cummings v. Skeahan Corp. 405 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, , (1972).
  • Viccinelli v. Causey 401 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, , (1972), as follows: "An attorney is obligated to exercise at least that degree of care, skill, and diligence which is exercised by prudent practicing attorneys in his locality.
  • Jenkins v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 393 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
    Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, , (1972), the Louisiana Supreme Court held in an attorney malpractice case that the plaintiff was entitled to recover from the negligent attorneys the additional attorneys fees that he would not have incurred but for the negligence of the defendant attorneys.
  • Ambrose v. Roberts 393 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, , (La.
  • Norman v. Drury 368 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    Co., 1972, , , and that case, because it is a separation case, is not decidable by jury, La.C.C.P.
  • Gill v. DiFatta 364 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
  • Langendorf v. Administrators of Tulane Ed. Fund 361 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    Co., , (1972), in which the attorney's fee incurred to correct another attorney's professional error was awarded as an item of damages in a legal malpractice action.
  • Corceller v. Brooks 347 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, , (1972).
  • Muse v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 328 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    774 , , 55 ALR(3d) 967, as follows: "An attorney is obligated to exercise at least that degree of care, skill, and diligence which is exercised by prudent practicing attorneys in his locality.
  • Watkins v. Sheppard 278 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, , (1972).
  • Vessel v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 276 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    Paul Fire & Marine, , , the Supreme Court stated in the initial sentence of the majority opinion: "Plaintiffs, four of the five children of John J. Ramp, Sr., brought this action in tort for damages allegedly sustained because attorneys who represented them earlier in their father's succession proceedings were negligent."