Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Foster v. Breaux, 270 So. 2d 526.

51 citing documents.

John Brandt Baxter, in His Capacity as the Independent Administrator of the Succession of August C. Baxter v. … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
So.2d 526, 529 (1972); (La.App.
Baxter v. Lewis 247 So. 3d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Foster v. Breaux , , , 529 (1972) ; Knecht v. Board of Trustees for Colleges and Universities , , 251 (La.App.
Northa Lee Holmes v. Triad Hospitality D/B/A Clarion Hotel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Co., Ray, So.2d 526 (1972).
Holmes v. Triad Hospitality 89 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Co., *537 Ray, ; , (1972).
Torres v. LOUISIANA SHRIMP AND PACKING COMPANY 32 So. 3d 803 La. 2010
Morrow v. Parker 981 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
OIL INS. LTD. v. Dow Chemical Co. 977 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
LaCombe v. Bank One Corp. 953 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Dr. Rick Lacombe v. Bank One Corp. D/B/A Bank One La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Foster 12 v. Breaux, So.2d 526, 529 (1972); Knecht v. Board 13 of Trustees for Colleges and Universities, (La.App.
Carter v. Haygood 892 So. 2d 1261 La. 2005
Elevating Boats, Inc. v. St. Bernard Parish 795 So. 2d 1153 La. 2001
See Lima, 595 So.2d at 629 ; , (1972).
Hendrick v. ABC Ins. Co. 760 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
King v. Phelps Dunbar, LLP 743 So. 2d 181 La. 1999
LeBreton v. Rabito 714 So. 2d 1226 La. 1998
Phillips v. Patterson Insurance Co. 704 So. 2d 246 La. 1998
(1972), which was followed by this court in Patterson , does not dictate a different result.
Paragon Development Group, Inc. v. Skeins 700 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94); ; , (1972).
Niklaus v. Bellina 696 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Landry v. Gibbens 665 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
(1972) and sever *1178 al Supreme Court and Fourth Circuit cases following Foster .
Adams v. Dupree 663 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
(1972); Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, supra.
Wells v. R.J. Marchand Contractors Specialties, Inc. 655 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Dolese v. Harvey 649 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
: prescriptive statutes are strictly construed against prescription and in favor of the obligation sought to be extinguished; thus, of two possible constructions, that which favors maintaining, as opposed to barring, an action should be adopted.
Cochren v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 639 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Cochren's reliance on La.Civ.Code art. 3503 , is misplaced.
Wimberly v. Gatch 635 So. 2d 206 La. 1994
Patterson v. Weber Marine 630 So. 2d 687 La. 1993
(1972), is dispositive of the prescription issue presented here.
Bouterie v. Crane 616 So. 2d 657 La. 1993
United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Cargill, Inc. 612 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
(1972); Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company v. Turner, 582 So.2d at 254 .
URBAN MGT. CORP. v. Shreveport Airport Auth. 602 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Montminy v. Jobe 600 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Lima v. Schmidt 595 So. 2d 624 La. 1992
Bennett v. Giarrusso 583 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Brown v. City of New Orleans 580 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State ex rel Guste v. Simoni, Heck and Associates, Gulf Oil Corp. v. State Mineral Board, on reh'g, , (1972).
Taylor v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 579 So. 2d 443 La. 1991
Provident Life and Acc. Ins. v. Turner 582 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Bernard v. Duhon 572 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Costello v. American Casualty Co. of Reading 562 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Bruyninckx v. Bratten 554 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
In the end, Bratten and Titan, , (1972), contend that where there are two permissible interpretations of a prescriptive statute, we must adopt that which favors maintaining rather than barring the action.
Fogleman Truck Line, Inc. v. SO. BULK CARRIERS, INC. 532 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
1 Cir.1970), appeal on other issues, , (La.
Howes v. Doucet 531 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Odessa House v. Goss 453 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Guste v. Simoni, Heck and Associates, Gulf Oil Corp. v. State Mineral Board, on rehearing, , (1972).
Washington v. Goldate 411 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Intern. Matex Tank Terminals v. System Fuels, Inc. 398 So. 2d 1029 La. 1981
Trahan v. Demarcey 381 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
1st Cir. 1970), reversed on other grounds, (La.
Corsey v. State, Through Dept. of Corrections 366 So. 2d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
(1972), Appellant argues that defendants' failure to plead prescription in the federal court suit, together with the stipulation entered into therein, constitutes a tacit waiver by defendants of prescription which had accrued, in the event this court determines that prescription had in fact run.
Verdun v. Plaisance 339 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Finally, we find no merit to plaintiff’s , (1972), which plaintiff contends is authority for the proposition that the filing of a suit, in a court of improper venue, interrupts prescription if the prescription plea is filed in a court of proper venue.
Gelpi v. Ben Development Company, Inc. 327 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
The Eustises seen to be suable in Plaquemines, either because they are estopped to deny domicile there, or because (as in Foster v. Breaux, 1972, , ) they have not timely excepted to the venue.
Small v. Caterpillar Mfg. Corp. 319 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
A , (1972) as follows: "Under Louisiana jurisprudence, prescriptive statutes are strictly construed, and of two permissible constructions that is adopted which favors maintaining rather than barring the action.
Gulf Oil Corporation v. State Mineral Board 317 So. 2d 576 La. 1975
(1972); Hebert v. Spano, 233 La.
Ray v. South Central Bell Tel. Co. 315 So. 2d 759 La. 1975
Ray v. South Central Bell Telephone Co. 303 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
(1972), the Louisiana Supreme Court applied the definition in C. C.P.
Conner v. Continental Southern Lines, Inc. 284 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
1112 , , this court stated: “Prescription is interrupted by mere filing of suit in a court of competent jurisdiction within the prescriptive period, but only by the service of citation if filed in an incompetent court, including one of improper venue.” , (La.App.