Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lambert v. Kelley, 270 So. 2d 532.

17 citing documents.

Chantel Edwards v. U.S. Property and Casualty Airbnb, Crawford and Company Chateau Management LLC. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
The act of depositing the document or pleading is the filing.” (citing State v. Brazzel, 229 La.
Corita Johnson v. Rosia Metoyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
The act of depositing the document or pleading is the filing.” (citing State v. Brazzel, 229 La.
Rollins v. City of Zachary 808 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Brevelle v. Howard 772 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
The act of depositing the document or pleading [with the Clerk’s office] is the filing.”
Bradley v. Theus 668 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Borning v. Bush 517 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Moreover, our Supreme Court held that marking the document or pleading “filed” and designating the date is evidence of the act of filing, but is not the act of filing itself.
Hospital Corp. of America v. Robinson 506 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Succession of Blythe 466 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Acosta v. Hepplewhite Home, Inc. 450 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Guillory v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT 439 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
See Reilly-Benton Company, -535 (La.
Thomas v. Department of Corrections 430 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-535 (La.1972), the evidence showed that a *1157 motion for a new trial was deposited with the clerk of court on February 10,1970, but was not marked filed until February 11, 1970.
Harper v. Housing Authority of Monroe 412 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
we stated, at page 499: “We note there is an apparent conflict between the Constitution and the Civil Service rule.
Smith v. Department of Health & Human Resources 407 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Ellzey v. EMPLOYERS MUT. LIABILITY INS. CO. 388 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
(1972), a motion for a new trial which was timely delivered to the clerk of court but which was not formally marked "Filed" and placed in the record until the following day when the delays for filing a motion for new trial had expired was held to have been timely filed.
McLaughlin v. Home Indemnity Insurance Co. 361 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Hayes v. Woodworth Trucking Co. 353 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
3rd Cir. 1960) writ refused, contends the trial court erred in failing to find he established by a preponderance of the evidence that his petition for damages was timely deposited with the Clerk of Court for Allen Parish, Louisiana.
Spiller v. Herpel 358 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977