Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Didier, 263 So. 2d 322.

66 citing documents.

State v. Brown 366 So. 2d 550 La. 1979
(1972); State v. Bonfanti, 262 La.
State v. Beavers 364 So. 2d 1004 La. 1978
2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977); , (1972); State v. Bonfanti, 262 La.
State v. Edwards 353 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
(1972) for the proposition that the State cannot denominate the same act under two different crime headings and prosecute defendant under both, since this would be double jeopardy and violative of Louisiana Constitution of 1921, Article 1, Section 9.
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Phelps 345 So. 2d 446 La. 1977
(1972), the identical conduct cannot be twice prosecuted by the state by labeling it as separate crimes.
State v. Cotton 341 So. 2d 362 La. 1976
(1972), where the Court held that a conviction of malfeasance in office barred prosecution for simple robbery and theft where the acts of malfeasance were the identical robbery and theft.
State v. Nichols 337 So. 2d 1074 La. 1976
1975); , (1972); State v. Bonfanti, 262 La.
State v. Smith 323 So. 2d 797 La. 1975
[2] , (1972), defendant, already convicted of malfeasance in office, was prosecuted for theft and simple robbery.
State v. Suire 319 So. 2d 347 La. 1975
(1972); State v. Bonfanti, 262 La.
City of Baton Rouge v. Jackson 310 So. 2d 596 La. 1975
153 , (1972) , (1972) in support of his position that the instant prosecution places him in jeopardy twice for the same conduct.
State Ex Rel. Moore v. WARDEN OF LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY AT DeQUINCY 308 So. 2d 749 La. 1975
1428 , 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1967); Hultin v. Beto, 396 F.2d 216 (5th Cir. 1968); Fain v. Duff, 488 F.2d 218 (5th Cir. 1973); Brown v. Cox, 481 F.2d 622 (4th Cir. 1973); , (1972).
State v. James 305 So. 2d 514 La. 1974
(1972); State v. Bonfanti, 262 La.
State v. Baskin 301 So. 2d 313 La. 1974
(1972), noted in 33 La.L.Rev.
State Ex Rel. Wikberg v. Henderson 292 So. 2d 505 La. 1974
See, e. g., the Official Revision Comment to Article 596 of the Code of Criminal Procedure; , (1972); Mayers and Yarbrough, Bis Vexari: New Trials and Successive Prosecutions, 74 Harv.L.Rev.
State v. Clark 288 So. 2d 612 La. 1974
And, from *617 inspection of the evidence in this case, the defendant will be adequately protected from further prosecution for the same offense for which tried, , (1972), Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436 , 90 S.Ct.
State v. Pettle 286 So. 2d 625 La. 1973
(1972), where a plea of former jeopardy was held to be well founded, was discussed in Richmond.
State v. Richmond 284 So. 2d 317 La. 1973