Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wooten v. Wimberly, 272 So. 2d 303.

26 citing documents.

The Cadle Co. v. Anderson 18 So. 3d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Id., at 265-266 ; see also, Continental Supply Co. v. Fisher Oil Co., 156 La.
Owens v. US Home, Inc. 552 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Lipps v. Bernstein 508 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
2103, 2104, 2106; 2 M. Planiol, supra, nos. 767-771; Wooten v. Wimberly, supra [ ] (Tate, J., concurring).
Bordelon v. Smith 506 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Gales v. Gold Bond Bldg. Products 493 So. 2d 611 La. 1986
1959); (Tate, J., concurring); The Work of the Louisiana Appellate Courts for the 1972-73 Term Obligations, 34 La.L.Rev.
Southeastern Fidelity Insurance Co. v. Porter 457 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
2103, 2104, 2106; 2 M. Planiol, supra, nos. 767-771; Wooten v. Wimberly [ ], supra (Tate, J., concurring).
Corona v. State Farm Ins. Co. 444 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
2103, 2104, 2106; 2 M Planio, supra, nos. 767-771; Wooten v. Wimberly [ ] supra, (Tate, J., concurring).
King Musical Instruments, Inc. v. Arceneaux Music Center, Inc. 441 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Narcise v. Illinois Cent. R. Co. 427 So. 2d 1192 La. 1983
[2] were expressly repudiated in Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins.
Schulze v. Perry 427 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 418 So. 2d 575 La. 1982
1973); Thomas v. W. W. Clarklift, Inc., (Dennis, J., concurring); (La.
Otzenberger v. Atlas Construction Co. 408 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Kern v. Travelers Ins. Co. 407 So. 2d 2 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
in determining *3 that this tort action did not create a solidary obligation between father and son.
Liedtke v. Allstate Ins. Co. 405 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
the Louisiana Supreme Court said: "As more fully stated in Deshotel v. Travelers Indemnity Company ..., the status of the father is `vicarious, secondary and derivative'; his liability is, in reality, an absolute liability imposed by statutea liability without fault."
Criticized Sampay v. Morton Salt Co. 395 So. 2d 326 La. 1981
Cox , which had been criticized, see, e. g., (Tate, J., concurring), was expressly overruled in Foster v. Hampton, supra.
Foster v. Hampton 381 So. 2d 789 La. 1980
and the comment at 35 La.
Thomas v. W & W CLARKLIFT, INC. 375 So. 2d 375 La. 1979
However, (concurring opinion), "[t]he Cox misinterpretation (that the obligation of employer and employee not being expressly stated as solidary, cannot be so under article 2093) in 1948 may be excused by the dearth then of translated doctrinal explanations of the reason for the Article and its function in our C
Moore v. Sun Oil Co. 357 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
involving the vicarious liability of a father for his child’s torts, is in accord.
Crandall v. Scott 350 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
Jinks v. McClure 344 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
held that a party who is only vicariously liable is not solidarily liable with the principal debtor.
Wunstell v. Crochet 325 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
1067 , (1971); see also the specific language in dissenting opinion in Wooten v. Wimberly, La., (1972).
Gauthier v. Scott 327 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
and American Bank and Trust Company v. Blue Bird Restaurant & Lounge, Inc., affirmed (La.
Lovett v. South Central Bell Telephone Co. 308 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Wooten v. Wimberly, La., (1972).
Town of Winnsboro v. Barnard & Burk, Inc. 294 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
Commercial Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Wilson 293 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Tabb v. Norred 277 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Our Supreme Court held in Wooten v. Wimberly, La., (1973), that the liability of the father under LSA-C.C.