Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Thrift Funds of Baton Rouge, Inc. v. Jones, 274 So. 2d 150.

20 citing documents.

Walker, Tooke & Lyons, LLP v. Sapp 862 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
9:3501; Thrift Funds of Baton *419 Rouge, (La.
Reynolds v. Succession of Williams 628 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
9:3601; Thrift Funds of Baton Rouge, cert.
Spencer v. Boucher 587 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
9:3501; Thrift Funds of Baton Rouge, cert.
Bonfanti v. Davis 487 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
This decision, however, appears to be in conflict with an earlier Supreme Court decision, Thrift Funds of Baton Rouge, [3] .
Broussard v. Crochet, Broussard & Co. 477 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Paulat v. Pirello, 353 So.2d *177 1307 (La.1977); Thrift Funds of Baton Rouge, (La.
Ganus v. Jopes 470 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
*240 Thrift Funds of Baton Rouge, supports this view.
Huddleston v. Bossier Bank & Trust Co. 463 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
We are not unmindful of the holding in Thrift Funds of Baton Rouge, cert, denied 414 U.S. 820 , 94 S.Ct.
Star Amusement, Inc. v. Strini 427 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
9:3501 reads: “Any contract for the payment of interest in excess of that authorized by law shall result in the forfeiture of the entire interest so contracted.” : “Statute providing for forfeiture of entire interest contracted for if in excess of that authorized by law causes forfeiture of all interest due on contract, not just usurious portion of it and not just portion due during period that usurious charges were exacted.” Star also contends, citing People’s Nation
Blanchard v. Progressive Bank & Trust Co. 413 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Thrift Funds of Baton Rouge, (La.
Bamburg v. Lavigne 403 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Thrift Funds of Baton Rouge
Citizen's Finance Service Discount of Baton Rouge v. Hollier 398 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Thrift Funds of Baton Rouge
Wright Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Scott 371 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
ever, purport to legitimize, as non-usurious, payments exacted after execution of a note not usurious on its face, when such subsequent payments in fact and by agreement of the parties constitute usurious interest.” We agree that the penalty or late charges assessed constituted usury, Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, Thrift Funds of Baton Rouge, thus resulting “in the forfeiture of the entire interest so contracted.” La.R.S.
Evangeline Bank & Trust Co. v. Guillory 364 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
9:3501 provides: “Any contract for the payment of interest in excess of that authorized by law shall result in the forfeiture of the entire interest so contracted.” Thrift Funds of Baton Rouge, cert.
People's Nat. Bank of New Iberia v. Smith 360 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Defendant relies on the language of the Supreme Court in Thrift Funds of Baton Rouge, stating that recovery of discounted or capitalized interest in excess of the maximum amount is allowable when included within the face amount of the note.
Paulat v. Pirello 353 So. 2d 1307 La. 1977
& Title Co., Thrift Funds of Baton Rouge, *1310 .
Paulat v. Pirello 345 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
3 Appellee relies primarily upon three cases, i.e., Thrift Funds of Baton Rouge, (La.App.
Karmgard v. SOUTHLAND MORTG. & TITLE CO. 341 So. 2d 1109 La. 1977
art. 2924; Thrift Funds of Baton Rouge
Karmgard v. Southland Mortgage & Title Co. 331 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Art. 2924; Thrift Funds of Baton Rouge
Holmes v. Eisler 289 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
9:3501; Thrift Funds of Baton Rouge v. Jones, La.1973, ; Budget Plan of Baton Rouge v. Talbert, La.1973, .
First Nat. Bank of Jefferson Parish v. Kindermann 280 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
Inc. v. Jones, La., (1973); Budget Plan of B. R. Inc. v. Talbert, La., (1973).