Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hart v. Richardson, 272 So. 2d 316.
-
William N. Keller v. Cleadieus McLeod
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Although interpreting a different version of the statute, explained: “There is no reference in 11 the act to an exclusion from coverage because there exist elements of a vendor-vendee relationship between the injured workman and the one sought to
-
Keller v. McLeod
866 So. 2d 388
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Although interpreting a different version of the statute, explained: “There is no reference in the act to an exclusion from coverage because there exist elements of a vendor-vendee relationship between the injured workman and the one sought to be held as an employer.
-
Granger v. Nelson Logging
685 So. 2d 400
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Malone & Johnson, Louisiana Civil Law Treatise, Worker's Compensation § 123, West 1994.
- Vickers v. Cajun Concrete Services, Inc. 634 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
-
Cline v. Pacific Marine Ins. Co.
619 So. 2d 1256
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
the situation involved a pulpwood hauler who hauled a specified type of wood to a pulpwood buyer.
- Certain v. Equitable Equipment Co. 453 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- Wilson v. Jacobs 438 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- Parnell v. Reed & Sims, Inc. 428 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Wilson v. Werner Co., Inc. 393 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
- Andrews v. Spearsville Timber Co., Inc. 343 So. 2d 1008 La. 1977
- Woodard v. Southern Casualty Insurance Co. 305 So. 2d 528 La. 1974
-
Bailey v. Southern Casualty Insurance
295 So. 2d 580
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
On these facts, the issue is whether Brown is to be legally characterized as a or as a vendor as in Taylor v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company, 220 La.
-
Woodard v. Southern Casualty Insurance
289 So. 2d 500
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
We agree with the trial court, also
-
Bellard v. Tri-State Insurance Company
282 So. 2d 453
La. 1973
Stevens v. Mitchell, 234 La.