Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. St. Amand, 274 So. 2d 179.

38 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Cassetti Dewayne Brown, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
  • State v. Hampton 195 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Pierre 131 So. 3d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Nickles 60 So. 3d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Armstrong 683 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. White 543 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Martin 543 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Owens 521 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Bessard 461 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Brooks 431 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    Amand, State v. Cousin, supra .
  • State v. Champion 412 So. 2d 1048 La. 1982
    Amand, In the instant case, sufficient time had elapsed since the arrest of the defendant on November 24, 1980 for counsel to have been retained.
  • Baltzar v. Missouri Pac. RR 406 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
  • State v. Tauzier 397 So. 2d 494 La. 1981
  • State v. Johnson 389 So. 2d 1302 La. 1980
  • State v. Lee 364 So. 2d 1024 La. 1978
  • State v. Leggett 363 So. 2d 434 La. 1978
  • State v. Dickerson 353 So. 2d 262 La. 1977
  • State v. Sheppard 350 So. 2d 615 La. 1977
  • Kyle v. City of New Orleans 342 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    Amand, : "* * * In determining whether reasonable cause for arrest exists, the rigorous proof required for conviction is not needed.
  • State v. Jacobs 344 So. 2d 659 La. 1977
    Amand, which had held to the contrary.
  • State v. Hall 342 So. 2d 616 La. 1977
    Amand, La., (1973); State v. Williams, 260 La.
  • State v. Clark 340 So. 2d 1302 La. 1976
  • State v. Vincent 338 So. 2d 1376 La. 1976
  • State v. May 339 So. 2d 764 La. 1976
  • State v. Randolph 337 So. 2d 498 La. 1976
  • State v. Ford 336 So. 2d 817 La. 1976
    Amand, critically noted on this ground, 34 La.Law Review 455 (1974), in holding that evidence of this nature is not hearsay and therefore not subject to objection as hearsay.
  • State v. Winston 327 So. 2d 380 La. 1976
  • State v. Luckett 327 So. 2d 365 La. 1976
  • State v. Maduell 326 So. 2d 820 La. 1976
  • State v. Neal 321 So. 2d 497 La. 1975
  • State v. Cousin 307 So. 2d 326 La. 1975
    Armand, Commonwealth v. Novak, 395 Pa.
  • State v. Brewer 301 So. 2d 630 La. 1974
    Amand, this Court held that although an accused has the right to counsel of his own choosing to defend him on a criminal charge, this right does not permit "* * * arbitrary action which obstructs orderly procedure in the courts.
  • State v. Jackson 296 So. 2d 320 La. 1974
    Amand, State v. Chambers, 263 La.
  • State v. Brooks 294 So. 2d 503 La. 1974
  • State v. Harrison 291 So. 2d 782 La. 1974
    Amand, La., (1973), once the relevance and probative nature of the evidence have been determined, the Court should not undertake to control the manner of the State's proof.
  • State v. Sarrazin 291 So. 2d 393 La. 1974
    Amand, (1973), with regard to probable cause to make a warrantless arrest stated: "Reasonable, or probable, cause to arrest exists when the facts and circumstances within the arresting officer's knowledge are sufficient in themselves to justify a man of average caution in the belief that an offense has been committed.
  • State v. Grant 295 So. 2d 168 La. 1973
    Amand, 1 Wharton's Criminal Evidence, Sec.
  • State v. Prieur 277 So. 2d 126 La. 1973
    Amand, La., , decided February 19, 1973; State v. Dodson, 260 La.