DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Griffith v. Roy, 269 So. 2d 217.

28 citing documents.

  • In the matter of the minors Josiah Carrier, Amelia Carrier and Jack Carrier La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
    App. 1st Cir. 9/27/96) - 34, 269 So.
  • In re Triola 236 So. 3d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    See Griffith v. Roy , , 731, , 224 (La.
  • Pierre v. Pierre 898 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • Metro Riverboat Associates, Inc. v. Louisiana Gaming Control Bd. 797 So. 2d 656 La. 2001
    art. 865; Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., , (1972).
  • Williams v. Boone 733 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    (1972), in support of their argument that this court does not have subject matter jurisdiction.
  • Willis v. Duck 733 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    (1972), a grandfather brought an action in district court alleging his grandchildren were neglected by their mother following the divorce of the children's parents.
  • In re the Tutorship of Watts 681 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Bouterie v. Crane 616 So. 2d 657 La. 1993
  • Blaine v. Granger 616 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    In Wood, supra, at 677 , the Court stated: , (1972), and argues from it that the district court had no “jurisdiction to deprive relatrix of the custody of her child” during the marriage.
  • RICHARD GUTHRIE & ASSOC. v. Stone 562 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • Kozlowski v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF HHR 534 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    [2] , (1972) at 221, like the Civil Code, terms the collective bundle of rights "parental authority" and explains its nature as follows: Our law specifically recognizes the strong ties and the reciprocal obligations and rights of parents and children.
  • Woods v. Monroe Manor Nursing Homes, Inc. 530 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    921 , (1965); , (1972); (La.App.
  • McManus v. McManus 528 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • Parrish v. Parrish 448 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    1st Cir. 1980); See also, , (1972); (La.App.
  • Succession of Wilson v. Wilson 446 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • Gremillion v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 430 So. 2d 1362 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • In Interest of Boudreaux 427 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Appellants argue that since this is a contest for custody between parents and non-parents, appellees should be required to prove them unfit as parents, , (1972).
  • Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc. 392 So. 2d 398 La. 1980
    art. 865; , overruled on other grounds
  • O'Bryan v. O'Bryan 391 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Girouard v. Halpin 368 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    (1972), a grandfather brought an action in district court alleging his grandchildren were neglected by their mother following the divorce of the children's parents.
  • Courville v. Courville 363 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
  • Dolhonde v. Dolhonde 357 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    Article 157 which provides that the parent gaining custody of a child shall of right become natural tutor or tutrix the same as if the other party were deceased, , (1972), that the natural tutor must qualify as tutor to represent a minor and that a parent with custody does not ipso facto become a natural tutor.
  • Lulich v. Lulich 361 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    (1972), the source article in the Code Napoleon permits a trial court to vest custody in third persons, but Louisiana chose to delete this option from its custody rules.
  • Wood v. Beard 290 So. 2d 675 La. 1974
    (1972), and argues from it that the district court had no "jurisdiction to deprive relatrix of the custody of her child" during the marriage.
  • Gervais v. Falgoust 289 So. 2d 161 La. 1974
    (1972) should be construed to limit a district court's consideration in habeas corpus proceedings involving child custody to questions of the prevailing party with legal authority.
  • Roy v. Reed 285 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
  • Borras v. Falgoust 285 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
    However, , (1972), Mrs. Borras contends that the district court lacked jurisdiction to determine whether or not there was a compelling reason to deny her parental right.
  • Stuckey v. Stuckey 276 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
    (1972) specifically holds that a district court of the state does not have authority to award custody of minor children to grandparents over natural parents.