Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jones, 282 So. 2d 422.

31 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Colby James Kinsey A/K/A Colby J. Kinsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
10/21/03)], 859 So.2d [649,] 652-53 ( ).
State v. Dorsey 74 So. 3d 603 La. 2011
Kang , 02-2812 at 4-5, 859 So.2d at 652 -53 ( ).
State of Louisiana v. David G. Sarpy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Sarpy 52 So. 3d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Lindsey 948 So. 2d 105 La. 2007
Kang , 02-2812, at pp. 4-5, 859 So.2d at 652-53
State of Louisiana v. Lisa Landry Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Johnson 941 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Kang 859 So. 2d 649 La. 2003
State v. White 574 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Chevalier 458 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Pettaway 450 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Davenport 445 So. 2d 1190 La. 1984
State v. Williams 375 So. 2d 364 La. 1979
State v. Lewis 367 So. 2d 1155 La. 1979
(on rehearing); State v. Hills, 241 La.
State v. Boen 362 So. 2d 519 La. 1978
State v. Senette 355 So. 2d 923 La. 1978
See State v. Nolan, La., (1977); State v. Jones, La., (1973).
State v. Alexander 351 So. 2d 505 La. 1977
State v. Holmes 347 So. 2d 221 La. 1977
State v. Williams 346 So. 2d 181 La. 1977
State v. Wright 344 So. 2d 1014 La. 1977
State v. Clark [La.], (1976), State v. Jones [La.], (1973).
State v. Nolan 341 So. 2d 885 La. 1977
State v. May 339 So. 2d 764 La. 1976
State v. Monroe 329 So. 2d 193 La. 1976
See also other instances where convictions were reversed because of improper curtailment of voir dire examination, such as: State v. Crittle, 263 La.
State v. Clark 325 So. 2d 802 La. 1976
Distinguished State v. Johnson 324 So. 2d 349 La. 1975
Defendant, contends that the witness was not impartial and that the challenge for cause should have been sustained.
State v. Nix 327 So. 2d 301 La. 1975
art. 786; State v. Hills, 241 La.
State v. Brumley 320 So. 2d 129 La. 1975
we held that because the object of the law is to select impartial jurors to try the issue between the State and the defendant, counsel in criminal cases should be allowed a wide latitude in voir dire examination.
State v. Elam 312 So. 2d 318 La. 1975
State v. Scott 307 So. 2d 291 La. 1975
State v. Conrad 304 So. 2d 318 La. 1974
State v. Corbin 285 So. 2d 234 La. 1973
State v. Abe Jones, Jr., (1973), (in which State v. Bell, 263 La.