Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Eros Cinema, Inc., 264 So. 2d 615.

13 citing documents.

State ex rel. J.S. 6 So. 3d 904 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
See State v. Eros Cinema, Inc., -720
State v. Mobley 568 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
(procedure to traverse attorney-client privilege); (procedure for challenging the forfeiture of a motor vehicle); State v. Eros Cinema, Inc., , (1972) (procedure for disposition of allegedly obscene materials under seizure); (La.App.
State v. Trahan 543 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Louisiana Toy Co., Inc. 483 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
The hearing provision of Subsection F amplified and replaced the procedure which had been established by the Supreme Court in State v. Eros Cinema, Inc., -20 , (1972).
State v. Walters 440 So. 2d 115 La. 1983
2789 , 37 L.Ed.2d 745 (1973); , (1972); Vance v. Universal Amusement Co., 445 U.S. 308 , 100 S.Ct.
State v. B. G. N. O., Inc. 371 So. 2d 776 La. 1979
2789 , 37 L.Ed.2d 745 (1973); State v. Eros Cinema, Inc., , (1972).
State v. Luck 353 So. 2d 225 La. 1977
The addition of this protection for a person accused of selling or displaying, etc., obscene materials was an obvious attempt to comply with the constitutional requirements enunciated by this court in Gulf States Theatres of La., and State v. Eros Cinema, Inc., , (1972).
Parish of Jefferson v. Bayou Landing Ltd., Inc. 350 So. 2d 158 La. 1977
The pertinent language is as follows: "In State v. Eros Cinema, ( , (1972)), this Court found that there was no way to preserve the best evidence in a criminal prosecution for exhibiting an obscene film except upon seizure of the film under search warrant.
State v. Shreveport News Agency, Inc. 287 So. 2d 464 La. 1973
See, e.g., State v. Eros Cinema, Inc., , (1972); Levy v. State, Char.
Gulf States Theatres of La., Inc. v. Richardson 287 So. 2d 480 La. 1973
In State v. Eros Cinema, Inc., , (1972), we specifically and unanimously determined that there could be no seizure of an allegedly obscene expression without a prior judicial determination of an adequate factual basis for a probability that the expression constitutes obscenity.
State v. Neal 279 So. 2d 172 La. 1973
The primary issue is whether the search warrant is defective under the holdings of this court in State v. Eros Cinema, Inc., , (1972) and of the United States Supreme Court in A Quantity of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205 , 84 S.Ct.
State v. Snyder 277 So. 2d 660 La. 1973
See State v. Eros Cinema, Inc., , (1972); Levy v. State, Char.
State v. Gulf States Theatres of Louisiana, Inc. 270 So. 2d 547 La. 1972
In State v. Eros Cinema, Inc., , (1972), we specifically and unanimously determined that there could be no seizure of an allegedly obscene expression without a prior judicial determination of an adequate factual basis for a probability that the expression constitutes obscenity.