Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, Inc. v. Talbert, 276 So. 2d 297.

29 citing documents.

Barges Unlimited Inc. and Cornelius J. Tabor, Jr. v. Morgan City Stevendores, LLC, Babin Marine, LLC, Roland Shapley … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, Inc, v. Talbert, ( La.
SBN V FNBC LLC v. Vista La., LLC 267 So. 3d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
E.D. La.1988) (citing Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, Inc. v. Talbert , ; Lubbock Hotel Co. v. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. , 77 F.2d 152 (5th Cir.1935) ) (observing that "[c]ommercial loan discounting facilitates commerce by providing a means of raising capital through the sale of debt instruments at a discount" and that "[t]he Louisiana legislature, as early as 1856, recogniz
Lee v. Sapp 265 So. 3d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
art. 854 ; Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, Inc. v. Talbert , , 302 (La.
FNB OF PICAYUNE v. Pearl River Fabricators 971 So. 2d 302 La. 2007
921, Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, (quoting Succession of Smith ).
Ascension School Emp. Credit Union v. Psha 916 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
art. 854; Budget Plan of Baton Rouge
Reese v. STATE DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY 866 So. 2d 244 La. 2004
art. 854; Budget Plan of Baton Rouge
State v. Garcia 672 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Art. 865; Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, Succession of Ridley, 247 La.
O'BANNON FOR O'BANNON v. Azar 506 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Budget Plan of Baton Rouge
Clingan v. Doughty 491 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, ” In discussing the liberal treatment to be afforded pleadings in Louisiana, the Supreme Court in Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana v. Louisiana State Employees’ Retirement System, held: “Pleadings must be construed reasonably so as to afford litigants their day in court, to a
Matter of Succession of Stevenson 492 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
art. 854; Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, (La.
Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. STATE EX REL. DIV. OF ADMIN. 486 So. 2d 95 La. 1986
Budget Plan of Baton Rouge
Jackson v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 478 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
art. 865; Budget Plan of Baton Rouge
Teachers'retirement System v. La. St. Employees Retirement System 456 So. 2d 594 La. 1984
Hero Land Co. v. Texaco, Inc., at 96 (La.1975); Budget Plan of Baton Rouge
Acadian Heritage Realty, Inc. v. City of Lafayette 394 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, "
Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. Perez 379 So. 2d 1373 La. 1980
Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, "
Wright Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Scott 371 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
It does not, however, purport to legitimize, as non-usurious, payments exacted after execution of a note not usurious on its face, when such subsequent payments in fact and by agreement of the parties constitute usurious interest.” We agree that the penalty or late charges assessed constituted usury, Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, Thrift Funds of Baton Rouge, thus resulting “in the forfeiture of the entire interest so contracted.” La.R.S.
Wexler v. Martin 367 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
See also Budget Plan of B. R., which discusses C.C.P.
Slay v. Smith 368 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, ."
Small v. Levy 355 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
NOTES [1] Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, (La.
Smith v. Scott 345 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, Cox v. W. M. Heroman and Company, Inc., Cambrice v. Fern Supply Company, Inc.
Primeaux v. Bennett Homes, Inc. 339 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, Cambrice v. Fern Supply Co., Inc., et al., (La.App.
Walker v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 334 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, (La.
GJ Deville Lumber Company, Inc. v. Chatelain 308 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
I think the ruling in Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, Inc. v. Talbert, La., (1973) is applicable here.
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc. 310 So. 2d 93 La. 1975
Budget Plan of Baton Rouge
Carlton v. Electrical Maintenance & Installation Co. 306 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Harsh rules of pleading are not favored, and each pleading must be reasonably construed so as to afford the litigant his day in court and to do justice.” See also Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, Inc. v. Talbert, La., (1973).
Holmes v. Eisler 289 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
9:3501; Thrift Funds of Baton Rouge v. Jones, La.1973, ; Budget Plan of Baton Rouge v. Talbert, La.1973, .
Cambrice v. Fern Supply Co., Inc. 285 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
We conclude plaintiff's recovery for future medical expenses is not limited by her petition's "estimate" of $1,000; discussing C.C.P.
First Nat. Bank of Jefferson Parish v. Kindermann 280 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
Inc. v. Jones, La., (1973); Budget Plan of B. R. Inc. v. Talbert, La., (1973).
Polk v. Hunt 282 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
In the recent case of Budget Plan of Baton Rouge, Inc. v. Talbert, La., , the Supreme Court reiterated the proposition that pleadings should be taken for what they seek and not be restricted to the label placed upon them.