Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dunn, 267 So. 2d 193.

18 citing documents.

State v. Bridgewater 11 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Noel 997 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Wilson 956 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
(1972), the defendant was found *48 inside a public building during business hours.
State of Louisiana v. Willard Brandenburg La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
2352 (1998) ( So.2d 193 (1972)).
State v. Brandenburg 949 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
2352 , 141 L.Ed.2d 722 (1998) ( , (1972)).
State v. Scott 948 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
The state contends that by crashing through the front doors, Scott committed felony grade criminal property damage *1163 which should be considered as proof of felonious intent; , (1972).
State v. Rivet 798 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
2352 , 141 L.Ed.2d 722 (1998); , (1972).
State v. Schleve 775 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
-96 (1972) (per curiam).
State v. Spain 757 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Smith 748 So. 2d 1139 La. 1999
Lozier, 375 So.2d at 1336 ("`[A]n entry into a building open to the public at the designated hours and within the designated confines is not an unauthorized entry regardless of the intent of the person so entering.'") ( , (1972)); see also State v. Harper, 246 Kan.
State v. Ortiz 701 So. 2d 922 La. 1997
State v. Walters 604 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
the Louisiana Supreme Court interpreted the application of “unauthorized entry” to a place of a business: In the case of a building which is open to the public, the consent to enter the building at the times which it is open to the public and within the confines designated is implied...
State v. Bailey 573 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Doyle 525 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
3rd Cir.1983); , (1972).
State v. Lockhart 438 So. 2d 1089 La. 1983
: As we construe the burglary statute, the entry must be unauthorized and this must be determined as a distinct element of the offense separate and apart from the intent to steal.
State v. Lozier 375 So. 2d 1333 La. 1979
(1972): "We conclude that an entry into a building open to the public at the designated hours and within the designated confines is not an unauthorized entry regardless of the intent of the person so entering."
State v. Sears 298 So. 2d 814 La. 1974
(1972); State v. Williams, 262 La.
State v. Baggett 292 So. 2d 201 La. 1974
(1972), noted at 34 La.L.Rev.