Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, 276 So. 2d 271.

40 citing documents.

  • Donovan Monceaux v. R & R Construction, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    In his brief, the claimant cites Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., (La.App.
  • Monceaux v. R & R CONST., INC. 919 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    In his brief, the claimant cites Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., (La.
  • Ringo v. Hawco Manufacturing 582 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    3rd Cir.1977), do indeed stand for the proposition that when an employer pays unearned wages to an employee in excess of his entitlement to worker’s compensation owed, or otherwise overpays an employee’s compensation benefits, the employer gets credit for these payments on a week-to-week basis rather than on a dollar for
  • Carter v. Continental Assurance Co. 554 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    4 Cir.1976); Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 13 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise, 2d ed.; Malone & Johnson, See.
  • Jim Walter Homes v. Lewis 544 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    Allor's primary authority was Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., which used 2 A. Larson, Workmen's Compensation, § 57.47 to interpret LSA-R.S.
  • Jolibois v. Hartford Acc. & Ind. Co. 486 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    See Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, (La.
  • Singleton v. Bushnell & Co. 437 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • Dusang v. Henry C. Beck Builders, Inc. 389 So. 2d 367 La. 1980
    In both Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., (La.
  • Booker v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc. 389 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Lindsey v. Continental Casualty Company, 242 La.
  • Meche v. Gulf Coast Pre-Mix Trucking, Inc. 383 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    In Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, the court stated that a skilled employee is deemed totally disabled when he is unable to perform work of the same or similar description to that which he performed before the accident.
  • Mayes v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. 379 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
  • Allor v. Belden Corp. 382 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., Thomas v. Holland, 345 * (La.App.
  • Lachney v. Cabot Corp. 368 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    161 , (S.Ct.1953); Futrell v. *504 Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, (S.Ct.1973); Malone, Louisiana Workmen's Compensation Law and Practice, Sec.
  • McMiller v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 367 So. 2d 1354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    See also, Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
  • Cousins v. Lummus Co. 364 So. 2d 993 La. 1978
    Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Lawless v. Steel Erectors, Inc., 254 La.
  • Duffour v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co. 359 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
  • Haughton v. Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Companies 355 So. 2d 927 La. 1978
    Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
  • Wesley v. S. S. Kresge Co. 354 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
  • Lewing v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc. 350 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Walters v. General Accident and Fire Assurance Corporation, Ltd., (La.App.
  • Thomas v. Holland 345 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
    Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
  • Norris v. Southern Casualty Insurance Co. 342 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    App.3rd Cir. 1974); Futree v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
  • Lucas v. Ins. Co. of North America 342 So. 2d 591 La. 1977
    Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
  • Loyd v. Atlas Construction Co. 341 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
  • Romano v. Davis 339 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
  • Marcotte v. Atlas Construction Co. 340 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
  • Gardner v. Minnie, Inc. 339 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Additionally, as being “but one feature to be considered by the courts in determining whether the employee is totally and permanently disabled”.
  • Parks v. Insurance Co. of North America 340 So. 2d 276 La. 1976
  • Walker v. Gaines P. Wilson & Son, Inc. 340 So. 2d 985 La. 1976
    Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
  • Lewis v. St. Charles Parish Hosp. Serv. Dist. 337 So. 2d 1137 La. 1976
    As we noted in Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, "`The law fixes disability in terms of loss of earning capacity, which includes the extent of the physiological impairment as only one factor.
  • Duray v. Continental Insurance Co. 332 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., , La.Sup.Ct.1973.
  • Deshotels v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York 324 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    the test for disability is whether the injury has substantially decreased claimant's ability to compete with able-bodied workers with similar skills in the general labor market.
  • Gonzales v. Coastal Wire Warehouse, Inc. 328 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    23:1206; Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
  • Bernal v. Employers Commercial Union Insurance 329 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Plaintiff relies heavily on the Supreme Court decision in Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity, in which the court determined that an automobile mechanic who had a similar knee injury to the one suffered by plaintiff, was totally and permanently disabled because of the duties required of a mechanic.
  • Lewis v. Davidson Sash & Door Co. 319 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    The trial judge, however, asserted that medical opinion as to disability is but one of several considerations that a court must analyze in making a legal determination of whether or not an employee is totally and permanently disabled, citing Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
  • Harrington v. New Orleans Saints Football Club 311 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    In support of the contention, plaintiff cites Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, La., ; Pope v. Coney, La.App., ; Myers v. Jahncke Service, La.App., ; Cranmer v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, La.App., ; and Hammons v. Mississippi Cottonseed Products Co., La.App., 160 So.
  • Ridley v. Employers Commercial Union Co. 312 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    Plaintiff relies on the holding in Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, which involved the determination of disability of a skilled workman, whereas plaintiff herein is a common laborer.
  • Lucas v. Insurance Co. of North America 326 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    ‘A worker will be regarded as totally disabled if he is unable to do work reasonably of the same kind and character as that which his training, education, experience, and status in life qualify him to perform, in the customary way without any unusual difficulty or pain.’ ” I
  • Duncan v. RJ Reynolds, Inc. 305 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    23:1221 (2); Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, , (La.S.Ct.1973); (La.App.
  • Lions v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. 297 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    In Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, La., , the test for determining total and permanent disability of Mr. Futrell was based on the fact that Mr. Futrell was a skilled worker.
  • Simien v. Haas-Hirsch Estate 278 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    The most recent case from our Supreme Court is Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, La., (1973), in which an automobile mechanic suffered a tear of the medial meniscus of the right knee.