Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, 276 So. 2d 271.
-
Donovan Monceaux v. R & R Construction, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
In his brief, the claimant cites Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., (La.App.
-
Monceaux v. R & R CONST., INC.
919 So. 2d 795
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
In his brief, the claimant cites Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., (La.
-
Ringo v. Hawco Manufacturing
582 So. 2d 987
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
3rd Cir.1977), do indeed stand for the proposition that when an employer pays unearned wages to an employee in excess of his entitlement to worker’s compensation owed, or otherwise overpays an employee’s compensation benefits, the employer gets credit for these payments on a week-to-week basis rather than on a dollar for
-
Carter v. Continental Assurance Co.
554 So. 2d 688
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
4 Cir.1976); Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 13 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise, 2d ed.; Malone & Johnson, See.
-
Jim Walter Homes v. Lewis
544 So. 2d 485
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Allor's primary authority was Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., which used 2 A. Larson, Workmen's Compensation, § 57.47 to interpret LSA-R.S.
-
Jolibois v. Hartford Acc. & Ind. Co.
486 So. 2d 283
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
See Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, (La.
- Singleton v. Bushnell & Co. 437 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
-
Dusang v. Henry C. Beck Builders, Inc.
389 So. 2d 367
La. 1980
In both Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., (La.
-
Booker v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.
389 So. 2d 84
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Lindsey v. Continental Casualty Company, 242 La.
-
Meche v. Gulf Coast Pre-Mix Trucking, Inc.
383 So. 2d 77
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
In Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, the court stated that a skilled employee is deemed totally disabled when he is unable to perform work of the same or similar description to that which he performed before the accident.
- Mayes v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. 379 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
-
Allor v. Belden Corp.
382 So. 2d 206
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., Thomas v. Holland, 345 * (La.App.
-
Lachney v. Cabot Corp.
368 So. 2d 500
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
161 , (S.Ct.1953); Futrell v. *504 Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, (S.Ct.1973); Malone, Louisiana Workmen's Compensation Law and Practice, Sec.
-
McMiller v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
367 So. 2d 1354
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
See also, Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
-
Cousins v. Lummus Co.
364 So. 2d 993
La. 1978
Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Lawless v. Steel Erectors, Inc., 254 La.
- Duffour v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co. 359 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
-
Haughton v. Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Companies
355 So. 2d 927
La. 1978
Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
-
Wesley v. S. S. Kresge Co.
354 So. 2d 617
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
-
Lewing v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
350 So. 2d 1320
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Walters v. General Accident and Fire Assurance Corporation, Ltd., (La.App.
-
Thomas v. Holland
345 So. 2d 1000
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
-
Norris v. Southern Casualty Insurance Co.
342 So. 2d 874
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
App.3rd Cir. 1974); Futree v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
-
Lucas v. Ins. Co. of North America
342 So. 2d 591
La. 1977
Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
-
Loyd v. Atlas Construction Co.
341 So. 2d 1245
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
-
Romano v. Davis
339 So. 2d 1309
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
-
Marcotte v. Atlas Construction Co.
340 So. 2d 341
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
-
Gardner v. Minnie, Inc.
339 So. 2d 1247
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Additionally, as being “but one feature to be considered by the courts in determining whether the employee is totally and permanently disabled”.
- Parks v. Insurance Co. of North America 340 So. 2d 276 La. 1976
-
Walker v. Gaines P. Wilson & Son, Inc.
340 So. 2d 985
La. 1976
Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
-
Lewis v. St. Charles Parish Hosp. Serv. Dist.
337 So. 2d 1137
La. 1976
As we noted in Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, "`The law fixes disability in terms of loss of earning capacity, which includes the extent of the physiological impairment as only one factor.
-
Duray v. Continental Insurance Co.
332 So. 2d 312
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., , La.Sup.Ct.1973.
-
Deshotels v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York
324 So. 2d 895
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
the test for disability is whether the injury has substantially decreased claimant's ability to compete with able-bodied workers with similar skills in the general labor market.
-
Gonzales v. Coastal Wire Warehouse, Inc.
328 So. 2d 923
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
23:1206; Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
-
Bernal v. Employers Commercial Union Insurance
329 So. 2d 907
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Plaintiff relies heavily on the Supreme Court decision in Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity, in which the court determined that an automobile mechanic who had a similar knee injury to the one suffered by plaintiff, was totally and permanently disabled because of the duties required of a mechanic.
-
Lewis v. Davidson Sash & Door Co.
319 So. 2d 800
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
The trial judge, however, asserted that medical opinion as to disability is but one of several considerations that a court must analyze in making a legal determination of whether or not an employee is totally and permanently disabled, citing Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
-
Harrington v. New Orleans Saints Football Club
311 So. 2d 555
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
In support of the contention, plaintiff cites Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, La., ; Pope v. Coney, La.App., ; Myers v. Jahncke Service, La.App., ; Cranmer v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, La.App., ; and Hammons v. Mississippi Cottonseed Products Co., La.App., 160 So.
-
Ridley v. Employers Commercial Union Co.
312 So. 2d 126
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Plaintiff relies on the holding in Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, which involved the determination of disability of a skilled workman, whereas plaintiff herein is a common laborer.
-
Lucas v. Insurance Co. of North America
326 So. 2d 525
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
‘A worker will be regarded as totally disabled if he is unable to do work reasonably of the same kind and character as that which his training, education, experience, and status in life qualify him to perform, in the customary way without any unusual difficulty or pain.’ ” I
-
Duncan v. RJ Reynolds, Inc.
305 So. 2d 707
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
23:1221 (2); Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, , (La.S.Ct.1973); (La.App.
-
Lions v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.
297 So. 2d 720
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
In Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, La., , the test for determining total and permanent disability of Mr. Futrell was based on the fact that Mr. Futrell was a skilled worker.
-
Simien v. Haas-Hirsch Estate
278 So. 2d 836
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
The most recent case from our Supreme Court is Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, La., (1973), in which an automobile mechanic suffered a tear of the medial meniscus of the right knee.