Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Crabtree v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation, 284 So. 2d 545.

18 citing documents.

Darbonne v. M&M Right of Way Contractors 693 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
23:1102 in response to " which distinguished an employee's tort recovery through settlement from recovery through judgment."
HOUSTON GEN. INS. v. Commercial Union Ins. 682 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Hermann v. Dockside Linemen, Inc. 583 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Rice v. Flour Constructors, Inc. 577 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
See also, Crabtree v. Bethle *1057 hem Steel Corporation
Faught v. RYDER/P I E NATIONWIDE, INC. 543 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
23:1102(B) which distinguished an employee's tort recovery through settlement from recovery through judgment.
Ramos v. SW La. Elec. Membership Corp. 536 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Aetna argues that the statutes were enacted to reverse the holdings of two Supreme Court decisions: (La.
Lupo v. State, Division of the Administration, Office of Risk Management 531 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
In Crabtree v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation, on rehearing, the Louisiana Supreme Court ad *1119 dressed a similar argument.
Babin v. Saturn Engineering Corp. 501 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Roger v. Estate of Moulton 494 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Wiley v. Richland Parish School Bd. 476 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Harris v. General Accident Group 459 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Stafford v. Dow Chemical Corp. 415 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Meaux v. Alexander 405 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
and by the First Circuit Court of Appeal in Roberson v. Fontenot Petroleum Co., Inc., (1st Cir. 1975), Writ refused, .
Lalande v. Index Geophysical Survey Corp. 336 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Roberson v. Fontenot Petroleum Co., Inc. 322 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
The Supreme Court of our state, writ denied, , have *290 decided that money received by way of compromise does not represent damages recovered by judgment; therefore an employer cannot receive credit against compensation
Verbois v. Howard 322 So. 2d 110 La. 1975
Crayton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 293 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
See also Crabtree v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation, La., (1973) which involved credit claimed by the employer for the amount of a compromise settlement made by the employee with the tort feasor, but the decision explains the rationale of the statutes involved and supports the result which we reach.
Compton v. North River Insurance Company 281 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
*852 The foregoing interpretation of the applicable statutory provisions was recognized by Justice Tate in his dissenting opinion in the case of Roberta Kistner, , in which case the Louisiana Supreme Court has granted plaintiff's application for a rehearing.