Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons, 283 So. 2d 85.

24 citing documents.

  • Gmac v. Crain Chevrolet-Olds-Pontiac 595 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    1st Cir.1972), affirmed (La.
  • McCormick Oil & Gas v. State 478 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • Barker v. Rust Engineering Co. 428 So. 2d 391 La. 1983
    Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons, C.C.P.
  • Darville v. Daigle Pontiac-Buick-GMC, Inc. 399 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons
  • Berry v. Berry 371 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    116 (1924); (1970); Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons, La., (1973).
  • Billedeaux v. Adams 355 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    Art. 1039, Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons
  • In re Lagarde 358 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    Art. 3556(31), Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons
  • City of Kenner v. Lawrence 355 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons, La., .
  • Martin v. Parish of Jefferson 351 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    576 , (1965); Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons
  • Moutz v. Moutz 347 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    See Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons, (La.App.
  • Something Irish Co. v. Rack 333 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons, La., ; Malone v. Malone, La., ; Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Cocreham, 251 La.
  • Kreshel v. Kreshel 326 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    See Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons et al.
  • Minsky v. Minsky 324 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    See Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons, et al
  • Elrod v. City of Shreveport 322 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons, et al., La., (1973).
  • Reeves v. Reeves 315 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    Article 2162; Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal of the State of Louisiana, Rule VII, Section V(c); Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons, La., (1973); (La.App.
  • State v. Moore 305 So. 2d 532 La. 1975
    In reversing in State v. Sam, we held, : "There is no showing that the witness has been diligently sought without avail or that the prosecution has made a good-faith effort to secure the witness' presence at the trial, in the absence of which showing the defendant's constitutional and statutory rights to have the live-witness testify before the trial jury
  • Payton v. Aetna Life and Casualty Company 299 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    In Thurman v. Star Electric Supply, Inc., La., (1973), the Supreme Court cited Wright, Jr. v. Mark C. Smith & Sons, La., (1973) for the proposition that a "motion for a new trial by one defendant does not operate as if it were a motion for a new trial on behalf of all defendants."
  • Danel-Ryder, Inc. v. Van Way 297 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    2087, 2088, 2162; Courts of Appeal-Uniform Rules, Rule VII, Section 5(c); Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons, (La.
  • Broussard v. Daigle 295 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    Article 2162; Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal of the State of Louisiana, Rule VII, Section V(c); Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons, La., (1973); (La.App.
  • Jones v. Starr 295 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    art. 2088, resulting from untimely filing of an appeal bond (see also Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons, La.1973, ), we dismiss this appeal although we have already taken it under submission after briefing and oral argument.
  • Woodsum v. New Orleans Public Library 289 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    However, the ordinary rule has been that an appeal by one solidary obligor does not “inure to the benefit of other solidary obligors”; see Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons, La.1973, .
  • Deslattes v. First Management Corp. 286 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
  • Thurman v. Star Electric Supply, Inc. 283 So. 2d 212 La. 1973
    Wright, Jr. v. Mark C. Smith & Sons et al., La., (judgments rendered June 11, 1973); Wright, Jr. v. Mark C. Smith & Sons Partnership et al., La.App.
  • Palmer v. Trestman 282 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    576 , (1966), to supply the closely-related plea that, as recently reaffirmed, Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons, La., (1973), our “jurisdiction”, as C.C.P.